COMMONWEALTH v. KAREN READ INDEPENDENT ARCHIVE / RESEARCH EDITION
COURT OUTCOME 18 JUN 2025

Acquitted of the death-related charges. Convicted of operating under the influence.

Read the verdict
THE READ RECORD / SOURCE-LINKED RESEARCH

Evidence library

A selected source-linked collection. Testimony, interpretation, and procedural outcomes remain distinct.

  • E01 / Expert interpretation

    The recorded reverse maneuver

    Welcher described reverse travel at about 23 mph when the recorded interval ended.

    Around 12:32 a.m.; Disputed expert clock alignment

  • E02 / Expert interpretation

    O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity

    Whiffin placed the last recorded overnight Apple Health activity at approximately 12:32 a.m.

    Around 12:32 a.m.; Device data interpreted by expert

  • E03 / Expert interpretation

    The phone battery-temperature record

    Whiffin described the battery cooling from about 72 F at 12:37 a.m. to 37 F at 6:14 a.m.

    12:37 a.m. to 6:14 a.m.; Device-sensor timestamps

  • E04 / Witness testimony

    McCabe's arrival messages

    McCabe described sending arrival and parking messages while seeing a dark SUV outside the house.

    After midnight; arrival and parking; Witness testimony; exact message times not verified here

  • E05 / Recorded communications

    Read's phone reconnects to home Wi-Fi

    Trial reporting places a connection to O'Keefe's home Wi-Fi at approximately 12:36 a.m.

    Around 12:36 a.m.; Network time described in trial reporting

  • E06 / Recorded communications

    Overnight calls, texts, and voicemails

    Jurors heard voicemails and were shown messages sent after O'Keefe stopped responding.

    12:33 a.m. onward; Phone records

  • E07 / Video with expert analysis

    The driveway contact on Ring video

    Trial reporting describes Ring footage of Read reversing beside O'Keefe's parked Traverse and Welcher's contact analysis.

    Around 5:07 a.m.; Video time reported in trial coverage; original clock not independently verified

  • E08 / Disputed witness testimony

    Statements reported by first responders

    First responders attributed affirmative statements about hitting O'Keefe to Read.

    Around 6 a.m.; Witness recollection

  • E09 / Disputed witness testimony

    The taillight before towing

    Witnesses described damage in Dighton before the Lexus was towed to Canton.

    Afternoon; Witness observations described in trial reporting

  • E10 / Investigation testimony

    The taillight recovery timeline

    The Dighton observations, Canton arrival, and first SERT recovery, with our assessment of the sallyport planting allegation.

    Approximately 5:35-5:45 p.m.; Comparison of approximate witness-reported event times

  • E11 / Laboratory testimony

    The reconstructed taillight

    Vallier described physical fits connecting recovered plastic to the damaged taillight.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E12 / Laboratory testimony

    Clothing debris and glass comparisons

    Hanley described comparisons involving plastic particles and separate groups of glass fragments.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E13 / Laboratory testimony

    DNA and the hair from the Lexus

    Laboratory witnesses described DNA results associated with a taillight sample and a hair.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E14 / Medical testimony

    Autopsy findings and injury mechanisms

    Scordi-Bello identified blunt-impact head injuries and hypothermia, with manner of death undetermined.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E15 / Expert demonstration

    The blue-paint contact demonstration

    Welcher used transfer material and body positioning to demonstrate possible arm-contact locations.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E16 / Expert demonstration

    ARCCA testing and disputed biomechanics

    Rentschler testified that O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with being struck by Read's SUV; the prosecution challenged his analysis.

    Testimony date; Court-session date

  • E17 / Disputed expert interpretation

    The disputed Safari search timestamp

    Experts disagreed over the meaning of a 2:27 a.m. artifact associated with a later cold-survival search.

    Testimony date; Artifact time is disputed

  • E18 / Video described in testimony

    Bar footage and departure

    Bukhenik used surveillance footage to describe Read and O'Keefe's evening in Canton.

    Evening; Video presented in testimony

  • E19 / Investigation testimony

    The initial snow-covered scene search

    Gallagher described clearing snow and collecting apparently bloodstained snow in plastic cups.

    Morning; Investigator recollection

  • E20 / Court outcome

    The first trial ends in a mistrial

    The first jury did not return a verdict. A mistrial was declared on July 1, 2024.

    Mistrial declared; Court date

  • E21 / Court outcome

    The June 18, 2025 verdict

    Read was acquitted of the death-related charges and convicted of operating under the influence.

    Verdict returned; Court date

  • E22 / Witness testimony

    Directions and arrival at Fairview

    McCabe described giving O'Keefe directions and expecting him to join the gathering.

    Trip to Fairview; phone arrival around 12:24 a.m. (Whiffin); Witness account; exact interval not verified here

  • E23 / Recorded communications

    The January 28 daytime text exchange

    Guarino presented messages about the relationship, arguments, and plans to meet.

    Daytime, before the bars; Date of messages

  • E24 / Witness testimony

    The early-morning calls to friends

    McCabe and Roberts described calls from Read before O'Keefe was found.

    Approximately 4:53-5:00 a.m.; Witness accounts and call records

  • E25 / Recorded communications and testimony

    Discovery, 911 call, and attempted aid

    The women found O'Keefe on the lawn, and the jury heard the ensuing emergency call.

    Around 6 a.m.; discovery and response; Witness estimates and reported emergency-call playback

  • E26 / Laboratory result and expert calculation

    Hospital alcohol testing and extrapolation

    Knowles estimated an earlier blood-alcohol range using a later hospital serum result.

    Morning blood draw; earlier time estimated; Laboratory time and retrospective estimate

  • E27 / Witness testimony

    Police contact with the Albert household

    Witnesses described conversations with household occupants rather than a forensic search of the home.

    Morning; Witness accounts

  • E28 / Witness testimony

    Later searches and evidence-bag documentation

    Additional material was recovered at Fairview after the initial SERT search.

    February follow-up searches; Multiple dates; not a single recovery

  • E29 / Video and witness testimony

    Sallyport video orientation and custody testimony

    The jury examined mirrored surveillance footage and a corrected orientation.

    Evening at Canton police headquarters; Video time and testimony

  • E30 / Laboratory testimony

    Vehicle and garment examination

    Hartnett described collecting material, examining clothing, and testing sampled vehicle areas for blood.

    Retrial testimony; Date of testimony

  • E31 / Witness testimony

    Higgins: messages and telephone handling

    Higgins was questioned about communications, movements, and disposal of a phone and SIM card.

    First-trial testimony; Date of testimony

  • E32 / Witness testimony

    Albert-family accounts and overnight calls

    Family members described the gathering and denied seeing O'Keefe enter the house.

    First-trial testimony; Date of testimony

  • E33 / Witness testimony

    The snowplow driver's observations

    Loughran described passes through the area and not seeing a body during an earlier pass.

    Approximately 2:45 and 3:30 a.m.; Witness estimates

  • E34 / Recorded messages and testimony

    Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial

    Messages were admitted through a recipient, with a limitation tied to the investigator's state of mind.

    Retrial testimony; Date admitted through witness

  • E35 / Laboratory testimony

    Animal-DNA testing of two clothing swabs

    Kun reported no canine DNA and detected pig DNA in the submitted swabs.

    First-trial testimony; Date of testimony

  • E36 / Expert interpretation

    Russell's opinion about the arm wounds

    Russell attributed the arm-mark pattern to a dog; the prosecution challenged her analysis.

    June 2-3 testimony; Dates of testimony

  • E37 / Court outcome

    The appellate decision allowing retrial

    The Supreme Judicial Court allowed the case to proceed after the first mistrial.

    Decision issued; Court date

  • E38 / Reported procedural history

    ARCCA retention and the expert-disclosure dispute

    ARCCA's original federal work and subsequent defense-funded work were separate stages.

    Pre-retrial proceedings; Date of reporting

  • E39 / Public interview

    Read's public account of the side entrance

    Read described watching O'Keefe approach a side entrance before looking at her phone.

    Nightline interview reporting; Publication date

  • E40 / Expert interpretation

    ARCCA test configurations and cross-examination

    Wolfe described controlled tests; cross-examination examined how their conditions differed from a person.

    June 6 and June 9 testimony; Dates of testimony

  • E41 / Civil proceedings / accountability

    The O'Keefe family's wrongful-death case

    The family is pursuing a civil case against Read and the businesses behind C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall. It has not reached the scheduled trial.

    2024-08-26; Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.

  • E42 / Civil proceedings / accountability

    Read's lawsuit against investigators and witnesses

    Read's claims against individual investigators and civilian witnesses are being litigated separately in federal court. The public mirror we checked is incomplete as a current-status source.

    2025-11-25; Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.

  • E43 / Civil proceedings / accountability

    Proctor's misconduct and professional accountability

    The POST Commission issued a suspension of Michael Proctor's police certification in December 2025. That official action belongs alongside the documented misconduct already discussed in our evidence review.

    2025-12-18; Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.

  • E44 / Civil proceedings / accountability

    Witnesses' claims against Read and Kearney

    Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert and Brian Higgins sued Read and Aidan Kearney over statements and conduct they allege harmed them. The case remains contested.

    2026-04-16; Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.

  • E45 / Civil proceedings / accountability

    Read's separate case against the agencies

    Read also sued the Massachusetts State Police and the Town of Canton. This is a separate state case from her federal claims against individuals.

    2026-06-04; Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.

Search the record

Search covers this collection, not the entire trial transcript.

Document a correction

This preview creates a note on your device. Nothing is submitted or sent.

Evidence image