COMMONWEALTH v. KAREN READ INDEPENDENT ARCHIVE / RESEARCH EDITION
COURT OUTCOME 18 JUN 2025

Acquitted of the death-related charges. Convicted of operating under the influence.

Read the verdict
E14 / SOURCE-LINKED RECORD

Autopsy findings and injury mechanisms

Scordi-Bello identified blunt-impact head injuries and hypothermia, with manner of death undetermined.

What the record shows

Medical testimony addressed the posterior head wound, fractures, facial findings, and right-arm abrasions. Wolf explained that orbital bruising can follow skull injury. Laposata disputed aspects of the proposed ground-impact and spoiler mechanisms.

Laposata specifically disputed hypothermia as a cause of death and a fall onto flat ground as the cause of the posterior head wound. She interpreted that wound as indicating an impact against a ridged object. Those were disputed expert opinions; they do not identify an actual object, location, or assailant.

Limits and disputed context

A medical finding and an opinion about the object or sequence that caused it are distinct. The experts did not agree on one complete injury sequence.

S11: Scordi-Bello: autopsy findings and undetermined manner

Medical examiner testimony

Open publisher source

S10: Hanley: glass and plastic; Wolf: head-injury testimony

1:05 p.m. and 3:05 p.m. updates; Hanley comparisons

Open publisher source

S24: Laposata and Rentschler discuss injury mechanisms

Defense medical and biomechanical testimony

Open publisher source

Search the record

Search covers this collection, not the entire trial transcript.

Document a correction

This preview creates a note on your device. Nothing is submitted or sent.

Evidence image