Hanley described comparisons involving plastic particles and separate groups of glass fragments.
What the record shows
Her testimony distinguished particles consistent with taillight plastic from larger physical-fit comparisons. Six scene pieces were described as fitting the drinking glass; bumper glass was not identified by a physical fit to that glass.
Limits and disputed context
Material consistency is not unique identification of every particle. Glass from different recovery locations must not be silently combined into a single matched source.
S10: Hanley: glass and plastic; Wolf: head-injury testimony
1:05 p.m. and 3:05 p.m. updates; Hanley comparisons
Open publisher source