COMMONWEALTH v. KAREN READ INDEPENDENT ARCHIVE / RESEARCH EDITION
COURT OUTCOME 18 JUN 2025

Acquitted of the death-related charges. Convicted of operating under the influence.

Read the verdict
E41 / SOURCE-LINKED RECORD

The O'Keefe family's wrongful-death case

The family is pursuing a civil case against Read and the businesses behind C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall. It has not reached the scheduled trial.

What the record shows

The August 2024 complaint alleges that Read caused John's death and that the bars bear responsibility for serving her alcohol. Those are the family's claims, not findings made by this lawsuit.

A September 15, 2026 scheduling order sets the next major dates. Summary judgment asks the judge whether claims can be decided without a trial; the scheduled hearing does not tell us how the judge will rule.

Civil claims generally use a different burden from criminal charges: more likely true than not, rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The death-related acquittals remain the criminal outcome. They do not themselves resolve this civil case.

Key facts

Status at review
Open — Plymouth Superior 2483CV00692
Next step / latest development
Summary-judgment hearing: November 24, 2026, 10 a.m. Trial scheduled: April 5, 2027, 9 a.m. Local court time; dates may change.
Checked
October 28, 2026

Limits and disputed context

There is no civil verdict in the docket we checked. A scheduled trial is not a promised date or a finding of liability. We have not independently reviewed every discovery filing.

OUR INTERPRETATION / THE READ RECORD

How we read this development

Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.

Why we give this weight

We see this case as a separate forum for testing responsibility for John's death. We will examine the evidence it produces; the family's decision to sue is not additional proof of a collision.

The material challenge

A civil claim can fail even when the plaintiff sincerely believes it, and a lower burden does not guarantee success.

Our response

Our view of the trial evidence stands on the sources already presented. We will distinguish new evidence from repeated allegations and correct our assessment if warranted.

What we are not claiming

Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.

S59: O'Keefe family civil case: Plymouth Superior docket

Plymouth Superior 2483CV00692; September 15, 2026 scheduling order, paper 189; October 15-16 entries.

Open publisher source

S60: O'Keefe family wrongful-death complaint

Pages 1-5, caption and allegations, including paragraphs 25-37.

Open publisher source

S61: Civil burden of proof: Superior Court model instruction

Precharge script, page 6: preponderance of the evidence.

Open publisher source

Search the record

Search covers this collection, not the entire trial transcript.

Document a correction

This preview creates a note on your device. Nothing is submitted or sent.

Evidence image