{ "records": [ { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The recorded reverse maneuver", "summary": "Welcher described reverse travel at about 23 mph when the recorded interval ended.", "references": [ "S02", "S03", "S21", "S22", "S43", "S08", "S46", "S47", "S19", "S10", "S36", "S12", "S24", "S11", "S30", "S34", "S29", "S05", "S13", "S01" ], "limitations": "This is not a pedestrian-impact recording. A recorded reverse event does not, by itself, identify contact with a person. The recording endpoint is not a verified impact time or impact speed.", "category": "digital", "kind": "Expert interpretation", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 12:32 a.m.", "time_basis": "Disputed expert clock alignment", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 20, "body": [ "Welcher described approximately 74 percent accelerator application during the reverse event. The cited report combines forward and reverse distance descriptions; we have not verified a reverse-only distance against the original exhibit. A disputed clock adjustment places the event around 12:32 a.m.", "The vehicle recording and the clock alignment are separate parts of the analysis. Defense engineer Matthew DiSogra disputed the synchronization method.", "Burgess used a three-point turn to align the clocks after questioning call-log synchronization. DiSogra regarded that approach as valid but argued that alternative offsets should also be considered. These are competing expert analyses, not independently synchronized observations.", "The supporting documents also include a separate 2024 vehicle-distance chart, reproduced below, and a CDR report. The chart displays a calculated 97.35-foot reverse total; we do not substitute that earlier calculation for the unresolved 2025 interval. The CDR report and vehicle-control-history table concern different records; the absence of a recorded crash event is not proof that no impact occurred." ], "people": [ "welcher", "burgess", "disogra" ], "facts": [ { "label": "Reported speed at recording end", "value": "About 23 mph" }, { "label": "Reverse-only distance", "value": "Original exhibit verification pending" }, { "label": "Clock alignment", "value": "Disputed expert analysis" } ], "analysis": { "title": "Why we believe John was struck by the Lexus", "scope": "We believe John O'Keefe was struck by the Lexus SUV Karen Read was driving. This is our interpretation of the evidence, not an established account of the collision.", "boundary": "Our belief does not establish intent, a precise impact time or speed, every movement after contact, or guilt of an offense. Karen Read was acquitted of the death-related charges. We keep that outcome, the strongest contrary testimony and the unresolved gaps alongside our assessment.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Our view rests on three connections: the substantial reverse maneuver Welcher described, the final overnight phone activity Whiffin identified, and the recovered pieces Vallier fitted to the damaged taillight. We find these more persuasive together than any one detail alone. They link vehicle movement, the phone record and material associated with the Lexus, although they do not provide a recording of a collision.", "references": [ "S02", "S43", "S08" ] }, { "text": "The proposed timing is important to our view, but it is disputed. Placing the reverse event near 12:32 a.m. depends on the prosecution's clock alignment, which DiSogra challenged. The phone's timing and location also have limits. We consider the proposed overlap meaningful without treating it as an exact impact time or a complete account of John's movements. Several readings from one phone are not several independent witnesses.", "references": [ "S02", "S21", "S43", "S19" ] }, { "text": "The plastic is a separate reason for our view. Fitted edges give the larger recovered pieces a more specific connection to the Lexus than a resemblance in color. But fitting pieces together answers which assembly they came from, not when they broke or how they reached the lawn. The smaller clothing particles and their handling require their own scrutiny. We do not describe every particle as a unique physical match.", "references": [ "S08", "S10" ] }, { "text": "We also consider the damage reported before the tow. Barros's account weighs against an entirely intact taillight arriving in police custody. It does not tell us what caused the earlier damage, and he said a later photograph showed more damage than he remembered. Welcher's driveway analysis is relevant to the alternative explanation, but its geometry and suspension assumptions were challenged. Our conclusion depends on the wider record rather than treating either point as decisive.", "references": [ "S36", "S03" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "The hardest objection is the injury evidence. Rentschler said the injuries and proposed movement did not support a Lexus strike. Laposata disputed a fall onto the lawn as the explanation for the head wound. The medical examiner left the manner of death undetermined. These are substantial problems for a confident reconstruction, not details we can dismiss because they conflict with our view.", "references": [ "S12", "S24", "S11" ] }, { "text": "The investigation creates another serious difficulty. Hartnett's tested vehicle areas did not yield a positive blood result. Collection and custody problems limit what later laboratory results can establish. Proctor's documented misconduct also gives readers a reason to scrutinize the investigators' decisions and accounts. We cannot make those problems disappear by pointing to a matching fragment.", "references": [ "S30", "S08", "S34", "S29" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We still find the combination of vehicle movement, phone activity and fitted fragments more persuasive than the alternatives reviewed here. That is our judgment, not a technical answer to ARCCA's objections. The test setups and John's unknown posture limit what a simulation can establish, but those uncertainties do not prove the prosecution's account either. We cannot fill in the missing movements or explain a precise injury mechanism.", "references": [ "S02", "S43", "S08", "S12" ] }, { "text": "We weigh allegations of evidence planting separately. Bukhenik's account placed him and Proctor at the station when the first SERT fragment was found and denied a detour or transfer. That challenges a particular planting sequence; it does not account for every earlier opportunity or erase the custody questions. We do not regard planting as established in the material reviewed. Nor would rejecting it, by itself, establish a vehicle strike.", "references": [ "S29", "S05" ] }, { "text": "The same distinction applies to the house and browser-search arguments. Limits in the phone data leave uncertainty about a person's route. The later-search explanation undercuts one allegation of advance knowledge; it does not tell us how John died. We believe a strike is the more persuasive explanation because of the affirmative connections described above, not because every alternative has been made impossible. The jury's death-related acquittals and OUI conviction remain part of this account.", "references": [ "S19", "S13", "S01" ] } ] }, "id": "E01", "slug": "e01", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "e054c300971e854509102f170be203a9cff4f52d74ebec34be154a6f4526f9fb", "file_sha256": "36a01d142de1d84d8a9cb43d62cde17482982bb52a874deec14b72440b63ac8e", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Complete 2024 exhibit 596 page: a vehicle-control-history distance table whose cumulative reverse-distance column ends at 97.35 feet.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "document_excerpt", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mc07abf47bdb4435880d7492c8ccb80f2.png", "source_locator": "WCVB-linked PDF, read-car-data-593-to-603, page 4 of 11; visible 2024 exhibit sticker 596.", "source_url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-car-data-593-to-603-667977ab0aa5c.pdf", "id": "Mc07abf47bdb4435880d7492c8ccb80f2", "changes": "One complete PDF page rendered to PNG and rotated for reading. No crop, redaction, annotations or invented values; embedded metadata removed.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 596 is a distance-calculation table, with a displayed cumulative reverse total of 97.35 feet. It is shown for comparison with the later testimony. This is not an independently verified travel distance, an impact recording, or the 2025 Welcher exhibit whose reverse-only interval remains unresolved here.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB; calculation attributed here only to the displayed chart.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "summary": "Whiffin placed the last recorded overnight Apple Health activity at approximately 12:32 a.m.", "references": [ "S04", "S43", "S19", "S56" ], "limitations": "A lack of recorded activity is not a continuous observation of a person. Location uncertainty and the limits of activity logging must remain part of this record.", "category": "digital", "kind": "Expert interpretation", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 12:32 a.m.", "time_basis": "Device data interpreted by expert", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 21, "body": [ "Whiffin testified that the phone's final overnight Apple Health activity was around 12:32 a.m., with none in that category until shortly after 6 a.m. His testing found movement-logging delays averaging 15-50 seconds; we do not apply that range as a measured correction to this phone's timestamps.", "Whiffin interpreted location and activity data as consistent with the phone remaining near the lawn's flagpole area from that period onward. Under cross-examination, he acknowledged that lower-accuracy coordinates could encompass the house.", "The independent Commonwealth v. Read transcript compilation records Whiffin acknowledging an Apple Health interval of 12:31:56-12:32:16, with 36 steps and an estimated distance described as about 84 feet. These are device-derived estimates, not a surveyed route.", "In that cross-examination, the 72-foot flagpole-to-door distance was put to Whiffin by counsel. An initial question drew a sustained objection; later he accepted a conditional comparison that could put the steps inside the house. That exchange does not independently verify the measurement. Doubling 72 to 144 feet is arithmetic for a proposed out-and-back path, not a phone record or proof that every possible route was excluded. The compilation is not a certified transcript." ], "people": [ "whiffin" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Three flights of stairs establish that John entered the house", "attribution": "Inference tested in the phone-data dispute; the heading is our formulation, not a quotation from a witness.", "basis": "Stair activity has been used to argue that O'Keefe moved inside the house.", "counter": "Whiffin attributed the stair entries to elevation changes during vehicle travel before arrival, separately from the final recorded steps.", "reasoning": "We find that explanation a substantial challenge to treating a stair count as proof of indoor movement. A sensor classification needs location and timing context.", "limits": "This does not prove the phone remained outside afterward. Cross-examination identified unreliable location data and a radius encompassing the house. We cannot turn the later activity gap or battery cooling into continuous surveillance of John.", "references": [ "S43", "S19" ] } ], "analysis": { "title": "Why the phone sequence matters to us", "scope": "Our interpretation of the final recorded movement after arrival and the overnight phone record.", "boundary": "This is our interpretation of the combined evidence. It depends on how completely the phone recorded movement and how accurately it can be located. Logging delays and location uncertainty prevent us from treating this sequence as proof of physical impossibility.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "What stands out to us is the sequence after arrival: the last recorded steps, no further recorded Apple Health activity until morning, and a battery that cooled overnight. We find that harder to reconcile with John entering the house with his phone and later being moved outside. But that reasoning depends on how much movement the phone actually recorded.", "references": [ "S43", "S04", "S19" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "Whiffin's tests showed that movement could be logged after a delay. Some location readings were also too imprecise to distinguish the lawn from the house.", "references": [ "S43", "S19" ] }, { "text": "The phone in Whiffin's freezer test cooled differently from John's phone. A falling battery temperature cannot, on its own, tell us where a phone was.", "references": [ "S04", "S19" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "The gap matters to our view, but it is a gap in recorded activity. We cannot use it to prove that the phone never moved or that entering the house was physically impossible.", "references": [ "S43" ] } ] }, "id": "E02", "slug": "e02", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "0c45f1d7623dc22ab3fd074c02c0555caa51904bdb9117dfec13829de53fe0e5", "file_sha256": "876f1d87c1970647755544cef877211512d756f48a9458f90111cb3752644bf1", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A courtroom display showing an aerial map, red location points and a stated 10-metre accuracy filter.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M51f2a59200b549e29630ed605b4d214d.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/28/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-april-28/", "id": "M51f2a59200b549e29630ed605b4d214d", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Courtroom photograph from April 28, 2025, showing a location-data slide discussed during Whiffin's testimony. The slide limits its plotted coordinates to a stated accuracy of 10 metres or under. We show that selection alongside the record's accuracy limits; it is not the complete phone history or proof of a precise position.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Pat Greenhouse / The Boston Globe", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The phone battery-temperature record", "summary": "Whiffin described the battery cooling from about 72 F at 12:37 a.m. to 37 F at 6:14 a.m.", "references": [ "S04", "S58" ], "limitations": "Battery temperature is not a direct reading of ambient air or body temperature. These readings do not independently establish the phone's exact location.", "category": "digital", "kind": "Expert interpretation", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "12:37 a.m. to 6:14 a.m.", "time_basis": "Device-sensor timestamps", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 40, "body": [ "The temperatures came from the device battery. Cross-examination addressed the more rapid cooling observed in Whiffin's separate freezer experiment." ], "people": [ "whiffin" ], "facts": [ { "label": "Reported first reading", "value": "72 F at 12:37 a.m." }, { "label": "Reported later reading", "value": "37 F at 6:14 a.m." } ], "id": "E03", "slug": "e03", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "f283348926d8806923593d9f0b6059856c0f57f0dba5025b45b4ed7ff13f2764", "file_sha256": "3d14708a29d3616ef653d040b87bb97f56186eeb7779346a6c2fa7da3f91d01e", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Courtroom table of phone battery-temperature readings for January 29, with the 6:14 a.m. row highlighted and later warming readings visible.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-27", "kind": "video_frame", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M6520e56bcb9e47d091916124d6dbc30b.png", "source_locator": "April 28, 2025 testimony; video 2:14:06, January 29 battery-temperature table.", "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF-_a161dss&t=8046s", "id": "M6520e56bcb9e47d091916124d6dbc30b", "changes": "Full displayed broadcast frame captured at 2:14:06 with optional subtitles off. Source framing, watermark and highlight retained. Embedded metadata removed; no retouching, sharpening, generated text or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "The January 29 battery-temperature table shown during Ian Whiffin's April 28, 2025 testimony. It lists 72 F at 12:37 a.m., 50 F at 1:36 a.m., 43 F at 6:06 a.m. and a low of 37 F at 6:14 a.m., followed by higher readings. No readings are shown between 1:36 and 6:06 a.m.; we cannot fill that gap with a continuous cooling claim. These are internal battery readings, not air or body temperatures, and do not independently establish where the phone was. The blue highlight belongs to the presentation.", "rights_label": "Credited broadcast excerpt for commentary on the displayed evidence; no permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Ian Whiffin courtroom presentation / Law&Crime Trials broadcast", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "id": "E04", "slug": "e04", "title": "McCabe's arrival messages", "category": "communications", "kind": "Witness testimony", "summary": "McCabe described sending arrival and parking messages while seeing a dark SUV outside the house.", "body": [ "Her testimony connected messages to O'Keefe with her observations of the Lexus and subsequent attempts to obtain a response. She testified that she did not see O'Keefe enter the house." ], "limitations": "Messages and recalled sightings are different kinds of evidence. This reported testimony is not a continuous record of the SUV or entry into the house.", "references": [ "S19" ], "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "After midnight; arrival and parking", "time_basis": "Witness testimony; exact message times not verified here", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "timeline_order": 17, "people": [ "mccabe" ], "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "Read's phone reconnects to home Wi-Fi", "summary": "Trial reporting places a connection to O'Keefe's home Wi-Fi at approximately 12:36 a.m.", "references": [ "S05", "S06", "S29" ], "limitations": "A network event places the phone in connection with a network at that time; it is not a continuous record of all later movements.", "category": "digital", "kind": "Recorded communications", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 12:36 a.m.", "time_basis": "Network time described in trial reporting", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 30, "body": [ "Bukhenik referred to the reported network connection while discussing unavailable Ring footage. Separate retrial reporting describes the calls and voicemails presented by Guarino." ], "people": [ "guarino" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Missing Ring footage establishes that Read deleted it", "attribution": "A counterclaim tested by the same standard; this is not presented as a defense argument.", "basis": "Missing footage has prompted questions about account access and deletion.", "counter": "Bukhenik testified that Ring supplied no evidence documenting Read accessing the account.", "reasoning": "We do not assign a deliberate deletion to someone solely because a recording is unavailable. The same distinction applies to missing material associated with other people.", "limits": "A gap alone establishes neither its cause nor the responsible person. The absence of an access record in this account does not prove that every possible form of access was impossible.", "references": [ "S29" ] } ], "id": "E05", "slug": "e05", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "Overnight calls, texts, and voicemails", "summary": "Jurors heard voicemails and were shown messages sent after O'Keefe stopped responding.", "references": [ "S05", "S16" ], "limitations": "Message content can be compared with other records. It does not independently reveal what a sender knew or why a message was sent.", "category": "communications", "kind": "Recorded communications", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "12:33 a.m. onward", "time_basis": "Phone records", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 23, "body": [ "Guarino described calls beginning at about 12:33 a.m. and presented eight voicemails in the retrial. The first voicemail, at 12:37 a.m., expressed anger; later messages sought O'Keefe's whereabouts. The first trial also included a 1:04 a.m. text saying Read was in Mansfield. The start of the calling sequence and the first voicemail are different times." ], "people": [ "guarino" ], "facts": [], "id": "E06", "slug": "e06", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The driveway contact on Ring video", "summary": "Trial reporting describes Ring footage of Read reversing beside O'Keefe's parked Traverse and Welcher's contact analysis.", "references": [ "S02", "S03" ], "limitations": "The video is distinct from the expert's reconstruction of clearance and damage. The cause of the upper-taillight damage remained disputed. We have not independently authenticated the original footage or reproduced the geometry.", "category": "video", "kind": "Video with expert analysis", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 5:07 a.m.", "time_basis": "Video time reported in trial coverage; original clock not independently verified", "phase": "morning", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 90, "body": [ "Welcher concluded that the low-speed contact occurred below the upper taillight and did not cause its damage. Cross-examination challenged his reconstruction, vehicle positions, and suspension-height assumptions.", "Welcher used later police-station measurements as the assumed suspension height for his reconstruction. The defense challenged that assumption; he cited the low driveway speed in support of it." ], "people": [ "welcher" ], "facts": [], "analysis": { "title": "Why the driveway explanation does not persuade us", "scope": "Our assessment of whether the later contact explains the upper taillight damage.", "boundary": "We do not describe the taillight's precise clearance as a direct measurement taken during the January 29 contact.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "The key question is whether the upper taillight touched the Traverse. Welcher said it did not. We find that explanation persuasive, so the fact that the vehicles bumped is not enough, in our view, to explain the upper taillight damage.", "references": [ "S03" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "That conclusion depends on a close clearance. The defense challenged the video geometry and the assumed suspension height; small errors in those assumptions could change whether the light made contact.", "references": [ "S03" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We favor Welcher's explanation, but we cannot rule out taillight contact simply by repeating his conclusion. The reconstruction depends on its measurements and assumptions. The video establishes a bump; identifying exactly which parts touched is the disputed step.", "references": [ "S03" ] } ], "claim": { "text": "The later driveway contact was offered as an alternative explanation for the taillight damage.", "references": [ "S03" ] } }, "id": "E07", "slug": "e07", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "Statements reported by first responders", "summary": "First responders attributed affirmative statements about hitting O'Keefe to Read.", "references": [ "S17", "S18", "S15" ], "limitations": "This is a dispute about words attributed to Read, not an agreed recorded confession. The cited reporting does not supply a conclusive contemporaneous audio recording of those exact words.", "category": "statements", "kind": "Disputed witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 6 a.m.", "time_basis": "Witness recollection", "phase": "morning", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 105, "body": [ "Nuttall and McLaughlin described hearing affirmative words. Read later described asking a question about whether she had struck him. The witnesses' documentation and recollections were examined in court." ], "people": [ "nuttall", "mclaughlin", "mccabe" ], "facts": [], "id": "E08", "slug": "e08", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "dd9bf3fc61d9a9f6519db680d36c757225a166b936e2f89af9103dc6616d7ca2", "file_sha256": "40069b6ff96a69e07fe1e918d19f07fd9a253c2555e7e6c09e2a375639042f91", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M606b84d82be342b9ba2cacba89d0b518.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/05/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-may-5/", "id": "M606b84d82be342b9ba2cacba89d0b518", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Katie McLaughlin testifying on May 5, 2025, in the retrial. This later courtroom photograph locates the source of one first-responder account. We do not treat it as a recording of the January 2022 words or as evidence that one recollection is more reliable than another.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Pat Greenhouse / The Boston Globe", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The taillight before towing", "summary": "Witnesses described damage in Dighton before the Lexus was towed to Canton.", "references": [ "S06", "S07", "S36" ], "limitations": "Pre-tow damage and the precise extent of that damage are separate questions. The witnesses did not give identical accounts. We have not independently authenticated the pre-tow vehicle condition from original images.", "category": "physical", "kind": "Disputed witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Afternoon", "time_basis": "Witness observations described in trial reporting", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 140, "body": [ "Bukhenik described a substantial missing section. Barros also observed damage, but said the later sallyport photograph showed more missing material than he recalled seeing in Dighton." ], "people": [ "barros", "bukhenik" ], "facts": [], "analysis": { "title": "What the Dighton observation contributes", "scope": "Our interpretation of the timing of observed damage.", "boundary": "Damage before transport is not, by itself, proof of how or where that damage occurred.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Barros described damage before the SUV was towed. That matters because the taillight was already described as damaged before it reached Canton.", "references": [ "S36" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "Barros also said the later photograph showed a substantially different extent of damage. That qualification belongs beside his pre-tow observation.", "references": [ "S36" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "His account supports preexisting damage. It does not tell us when each piece broke off, or settle why the later photograph looked different from what he remembered.", "references": [ "S36" ] } ] }, "id": "E09", "slug": "e09", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "summary": "The Dighton observations, Canton arrival, and first SERT recovery, with our assessment of the sallyport planting allegation.", "references": [ "S05", "S29", "S36", "S42", "S44", "S45", "S08" ], "limitations": "The approximate ten-minute comparison begins at sallyport entry, not the beginning of police custody. It is not a synchronized stopwatch measurement. This analysis does not resolve earlier access, the later recoveries, or every allegation about evidence handling.", "category": "investigation", "kind": "Investigation testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Approximately 5:35-5:45 p.m.", "time_basis": "Comparison of approximate witness-reported event times", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 160, "body": [ "The first SERT recovery and the later fragment recoveries were separate events. We compare the first discovery with the vehicle's arrival at Canton, using the approximate event times attributed to the witnesses below.", "Bukhenik testified that he and Proctor followed the tow truck without going to Fairview, remained at the station when the first fragment was found, and made no exchange of items there. Those are his accounts, not continuous independent surveillance of every action.", "The May 12 reporting also describes the vehicle seizure time being corrected to 4:12 p.m. That earlier custody is separate from arrival at Canton and falls outside the short interval compared here.", "The accompanying 2024 exhibit photograph provides visual context for the recovery discussion. Its sticker and the photographed scene do not independently establish the approximate event times compared here. We do not use the photograph to close the gaps in the custody or timing record." ], "people": [ "ohara", "bukhenik", "barros" ], "facts": [ { "label": "SERT commander arrival", "value": "4:56 p.m. (O'Hara testimony)" }, { "label": "Sallyport entry", "value": "About 5:35 p.m. recollection; 5:37:18 also appears in video questioning. Clock alignment unverified." }, { "label": "First SERT fragment", "value": "About 5:45 p.m. (O'Hara account)" } ], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Proctor took fragments at the sallyport and planted the first SERT find", "attribution": "A specific planting scenario tested here; broader custody objections are distinct.", "basis": "The vehicle's arrival and the first reported SERT discovery were close in time, prompting questions about access and transfer.", "counter": "Bukhenik's account places the investigators at the station at the first discovery and denies a detour or handoff. Barros had already observed taillight damage before towing.", "reasoning": "We find this narrower scenario unpersuasive on the available account: it requires an unestablished transfer, not just proximity in time.", "limits": "This relies on witness accounts and disputed clock alignment. Custody started earlier. Barros described greater damage in a later photograph. Earlier access and later recoveries require their own assessment; physical fits alone do not establish when fragments were deposited.", "references": [ "S29", "S36", "S08" ] } ], "analysis": { "title": "From the police garage to the first fragment: does the timing fit?", "scope": "Our assessment of a particular proposed sequence, not a finding about every aspect of the investigation.", "boundary": "We are not claiming planting was physically impossible, that no earlier access occurred, or that all collection procedures were sound.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Three details matter to us: damage had been reported before towing, the search commander was already at Fairview, and the first fragment was reportedly found soon after the SUV entered the sallyport. Together, these make the specific idea of removing pieces in the garage and planting them before that first find less convincing to us.", "references": [ "S36", "S05", "S42" ] }, { "text": "Finding fragments after police took custody of the SUV raises a legitimate question, but the order alone does not show that anyone transferred them. Bukhenik also denied a detour to Fairview or a handoff of items.", "references": [ "S29" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "Barros described more damage in the later sallyport photograph than he remembered in Dighton. His written report did not contain the full detail of his later description.", "references": [ "S36" ] }, { "text": "O'Hara acknowledged no scene tape, barricades, or police presence when he arrived. He said he did not see material introduced into his search grid. That does not document all earlier access.", "references": [ "S05" ] }, { "text": "The defense questioned the corrected sallyport-video orientation and Proctor's proximity to the right rear. Later discoveries and their documentation were also challenged.", "references": [ "S29", "S44" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "Earlier damage does not mean every recovered piece was already missing in Dighton. The later photograph still needs to be considered. But a difference in the damage described is not, by itself, evidence of someone carrying fragments to Fairview.", "references": [ "S36" ] }, { "text": "Our conclusion is limited to the proposed transfer between garage arrival and the first discovery. The timing and witness accounts make that explanation less persuasive to us. They leave earlier custody, later searches and gaps in the documentation to be assessed separately.", "references": [ "S29", "S42", "S44" ] } ], "claim": { "text": "The defense challenged whether fragments were removed or manipulated at the sallyport before being recovered at Fairview. We examine that specific sallyport-to-first-recovery sequence here, not every version of the broader planting allegation.", "references": [ "S29", "S44" ] }, "timeline": { "date": "January 29, 2022 / Massachusetts local time", "note": "Two parallel sequences, not a scale drawing. Witness estimates, a reported arrival time, and a discovery time are distinct. Blank periods are not reconstructed.", "interval_label": "Approximate reported interval: 10 minutes", "interval_detail": "The comparison uses an approximate 5:35 p.m. recollection and a reported 5:45 p.m. discovery. Nearby transcript questioning also refers to 5:37:18 on video. We have not independently reconciled these clocks; this is not a measured opportunity window or the full period of police access.", "events": [ { "text": "Barros reported a missing portion of the right rear taillight before transport.", "references": [ "S36" ], "lane": "vehicle", "time": "Afternoon / before towing", "title": "Damage already observed in Dighton" }, { "text": "Trial reporting describes the seizure time being corrected to 4:12 p.m. This precedes arrival at Canton and is outside the sallyport-to-first-recovery comparison.", "references": [ "S29" ], "lane": "vehicle", "time": "4:12 p.m. (reported correction)", "title": "Earlier vehicle seizure" }, { "text": "Bukhenik placed his arrival at Canton Police Department at about this time.", "references": [ "S29" ], "lane": "vehicle", "time": "About 5:30 p.m.", "title": "Arrival at the station driveway" }, { "text": "Bukhenik gave an approximate 5:35 p.m. recollection. Nearby questioning also refers to 5:37:18 on video. We have not independently reconciled these clocks.", "references": [ "S42" ], "lane": "vehicle", "time": "About 5:35 p.m.", "title": "Lexus enters the sallyport" }, { "text": "O'Hara said Tully requested a SERT evidence search.", "references": [ "S05" ], "lane": "search", "time": "2:32 p.m.", "title": "Search requested" }, { "text": "His arrival time is not a start time for every searcher.", "references": [ "S05" ], "lane": "search", "time": "4:56 p.m.", "title": "O'Hara arrives at Fairview" }, { "text": "O'Hara placed the first SERT evidence find at about this time.", "references": [ "S05" ], "lane": "search", "time": "About 5:45 p.m.", "title": "First taillight segment discovered" }, { "text": "O'Hara said the search stopped and he offered to return.", "references": [ "S05" ], "lane": "search", "time": "About 6:15 p.m.", "title": "Search suspended" } ] } }, "id": "E10", "slug": "e10", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "a536b326aba23b61582dcf94e2e9fe150810fe9a198914343d698f39e32082b9", "file_sha256": "775319efad82177c079c8826139aeec6c37c322bb4d12a662631551a640e1f7b", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A red object in disturbed snow at night, with 2024 exhibit sticker 114.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M43b2009c86204b80a43bc973618d15c8.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 114.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/111-to-121-page-04-666c7499c1648.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "M43b2009c86204b80a43bc973618d15c8", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 114 shows a red object in a snow-covered scene. We include it as visual context for the recovery discussion. The photograph is not a synchronized timestamp: it does not independently establish the first discovery time, the object's identity, or its earlier custody.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The reconstructed taillight", "summary": "Vallier described physical fits connecting recovered plastic to the damaged taillight.", "references": [ "S08", "S45" ], "limitations": "The reported physical fits of larger pieces do not establish that the microscopic clothing debris mechanically matched the taillight. The reconstruction retained a gap. The reporting places receipt of the clothing at the lab on March 14, 2022; Vallier could not account for its storage before then. A laboratory comparison does not establish the earlier chain of custody.", "category": "physical", "kind": "Laboratory testimony", "event_date": "2025-05-16", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 245, "body": [ "She assembled larger pieces and compared their broken edges with the taillight assembly. The reconstruction retained a gap. She also examined debris that had already been removed from O'Keefe's clothing.", "The accompanying photographs are labeled exhibits from the 2024 first-trial collection, shown as visual context alongside the 2025 testimony summarized here. We include both the assembled lens sections and the open region. The smaller clear component is also shown with its scale; these photographs do not independently establish earlier recovery or custody." ], "people": [ "vallier" ], "facts": [], "analysis": { "title": "Why a physical fit matters to us", "scope": "Our interpretation of the laboratory comparison, separate from recovery and custody.", "boundary": "A laboratory fit cannot tell us when a piece broke off or when it reached the place where it was found.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Pieces that fit along their broken edges tell us more than pieces that merely share a color. Vallier's description of that fit is an important reason we connect the larger recovered fragments to the Lexus.", "references": [ "S08" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "The reconstruction retained an unfilled gap. Laboratory comparisons also do not establish every event in the material's earlier handling.", "references": [ "S08" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "There are two questions here: did the pieces come from this taillight, and how did they reach the place where they were found? The laboratory comparison helps with the first. We still need the recovery and handling evidence to assess the second.", "references": [ "S08" ] } ] }, "id": "E11", "slug": "e11", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "8d143105fd6aeb95cdf28d47a2b58108d1117523f046cf73174277a13cb42b26", "file_sha256": "1103faa3ff3f20f9b5b9386a31a942c49a4ebad0e0de68361e1e629334264c83", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Red and clear lens sections with small labels arranged on a taillight housing; 2024 exhibit sticker 403.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mbf29d2d8c0b94935b85256775d0992c0.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 403.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/392-to-405-page-12-666d0937b9d2f.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Mbf29d2d8c0b94935b85256775d0992c0", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 403 shows labeled lens sections arranged on a taillight housing. We use this view to explain the physical-fit discussion, alongside the separate view of the open region. The arrangement does not establish when the pieces broke or how they reached the recovery scene.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." }, { "asset_approval_hash": "59deb690f22e7f69b901fc7dab92a3a48c1e15a7f8d0700465005ae1a4bfe714", "file_sha256": "2dba887fbe4771ffdb0396b82d92f028b36e04d97edaf91acd0a8d9468e6fbd2", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Labeled red lens pieces with an open region between sections; 2024 exhibit sticker 392.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mdca78e33866b4ff5adb66b414313b10c.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 392.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/392-to-405-page-01-666d09360001a.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Mdca78e33866b4ff5adb66b414313b10c", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 392 shows an open region among labeled red lens pieces. We retain this view beside the assembled housing because the gap is a material limitation. The image alone does not explain the missing material or establish a complete reconstruction.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." }, { "asset_approval_hash": "739db2d07d3e2d230c3e5eff9e2d1f7dadb81e097383c05fd1b8e5f689058aa6", "file_sha256": "cc2b7ca178cb1622ca09b2cfa4e9f9ece6b7350a45cb40d3508f65ee28f2effe", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Clear lens component with labels, a ruler and laboratory annotations; 2024 exhibit sticker 395.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Maad489736bee4aca8a829aa6895a4fdf.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 395.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/392-to-405-page-04-666d09362bdef.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Maad489736bee4aca8a829aa6895a4fdf", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 395 shows a clear lens component beside a ruler and laboratory annotations. This illustrates the larger components discussed in the physical-fit record; it is not a photograph establishing a mechanical match of microscopic clothing debris.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "id": "E12", "slug": "e12", "title": "Clothing debris and glass comparisons", "category": "physical", "kind": "Laboratory testimony", "summary": "Hanley described comparisons involving plastic particles and separate groups of glass fragments.", "body": [ "Her testimony distinguished particles consistent with taillight plastic from larger physical-fit comparisons. Six scene pieces were described as fitting the drinking glass; bumper glass was not identified by a physical fit to that glass." ], "limitations": "Material consistency is not unique identification of every particle. Glass from different recovery locations must not be silently combined into a single matched source.", "references": [ "S10" ], "event_date": "2025-05-21", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "timeline_order": 1000, "people": [ "hanley" ], "media": [] }, { "id": "E13", "slug": "e13", "title": "DNA and the hair from the Lexus", "category": "physical", "kind": "Laboratory testimony", "summary": "Laboratory witnesses described DNA results associated with a taillight sample and a hair.", "body": [ "The taillight-related mixture supported O'Keefe as a contributor. The mitochondrial result from the hair was consistent with his maternal lineage." ], "limitations": "Neither test dated deposition. Mitochondrial DNA does not uniquely distinguish one person from others in the same maternal line. The swab result was not a result from every recovered fragment.", "references": [ "S09" ], "event_date": "2025-05-19", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "timeline_order": 1000, "people": [ "miyasako" ], "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "Autopsy findings and injury mechanisms", "summary": "Scordi-Bello identified blunt-impact head injuries and hypothermia, with manner of death undetermined.", "references": [ "S11", "S10", "S24" ], "limitations": "A medical finding and an opinion about the object or sequence that caused it are distinct. The experts did not agree on one complete injury sequence.", "category": "medical", "kind": "Medical testimony", "event_date": "2025-05-15", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 1000, "body": [ "Medical testimony addressed the posterior head wound, fractures, facial findings, and right-arm abrasions. Wolf explained that orbital bruising can follow skull injury. Laposata disputed aspects of the proposed ground-impact and spoiler mechanisms.", "Laposata specifically disputed hypothermia as a cause of death and a fall onto flat ground as the cause of the posterior head wound. She interpreted that wound as indicating an impact against a ridged object. Those were disputed expert opinions; they do not identify an actual object, location, or assailant." ], "people": [ "scordi", "wolf", "laposata" ], "facts": [], "id": "E14", "slug": "e14", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "id": "E15", "slug": "e15", "title": "The blue-paint contact demonstration", "category": "reconstruction", "kind": "Expert demonstration", "summary": "Welcher used transfer material and body positioning to demonstrate possible arm-contact locations.", "body": [ "He wore comparable clothing and positioned himself near the vehicle's right rear. The demonstration addressed contact areas and low-speed movement." ], "limitations": "It did not measure O'Keefe's actual posture and was not a human impact experiment at the alleged reverse speed.", "references": [ "S02" ], "event_date": "2025-05-27", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "timeline_order": 1000, "people": [ "welcher" ], "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "ARCCA testing and disputed biomechanics", "summary": "Rentschler testified that O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with being struck by Read's SUV; the prosecution challenged his analysis.", "references": [ "S12", "S24" ], "limitations": "The experiments evaluated selected configurations. They did not record O'Keefe's actual movement. No hypothetical elbow swing is presented here as an observed event.", "category": "reconstruction", "kind": "Expert demonstration", "event_date": "2025-06-11", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Court-session date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 1000, "body": [ "Rentschler disputed the prosecution's proposed sequence. Cross-examination addressed dummy properties, unknown arm position and possible variation in taillight damage when test conditions change.", "Rentschler said the arm abrasions were inconsistent with taillight contact and disputed a glancing arm impact propelling O'Keefe into the yard. He maintained that the injuries did not support a Lexus strike. These were his expert conclusions, not an observed event or a court finding. On cross-examination, he acknowledged that arm position could change test damage; his biomechanical analysis did not establish how or when the scene fragments arrived." ], "people": [ "wolfe", "rentschler" ], "facts": [], "id": "E16", "slug": "e16", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "summary": "Experts disagreed over the meaning of a 2:27 a.m. artifact associated with a later cold-survival search.", "references": [ "S13", "S23", "S48", "S19", "S52" ], "limitations": "A database value, a software display label, and a search-execution time are not interchangeable. This entry makes no claim about the current behavior of AXIOM or Cellebrite software.", "category": "digital", "kind": "Disputed expert interpretation", "event_date": "2025-05-07", "time_label": "Testimony date", "time_basis": "Artifact time is disputed", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": true, "timeline_order": 235, "body": [ "Green's first-trial interpretation supported an earlier search. Hyde's retrial analysis attributed the earlier time to browser activity and placed the relevant searches after the morning discovery.", "The linked 2024 exhibit packet contains browser-artifact tables and explanatory slides, not a message conversation. It provides earlier documentary context for this timestamp dispute. Database labels, browser state and timezone columns must be interpreted with the expert testimony; a row is not automatically a distinct search made at that time." ], "people": [ "hyde", "whiffin", "green" ], "facts": [ { "label": "Disputed artifact", "value": "2:27 a.m." }, { "label": "Later search interpretation", "value": "6:24 a.m. (Hyde and Whiffin)" }, { "label": "Current software status", "value": "Not established here" }, { "label": "Deletion interpretation", "value": "No user deletion of this search (Hyde)" } ], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "The 2:27 a.m. timestamp establishes an early cold-survival search", "attribution": "Defense expert interpretation at the first trial; disputed by retrial experts. Paraphrase, not a quotation.", "basis": "Green placed the query at or before 2:27 a.m. Hyde and Whiffin disagreed with that reading.", "counter": "Hyde and Whiffin placed the search at 6:24 a.m. Whiffin's tests demonstrate an older tab-focus time paired with a later page URL.", "reasoning": "We give the explanation of the artifact's behavior more weight than reading its timestamp as the search time without that context.", "limits": "Hyde could not definitively explain the precise 2:27:40 value in her report. We have not independently examined the extraction; Green's disagreement remains part of the record.", "references": [ "S13", "S19", "S23", "S52" ] }, { "title": "A deleted label means McCabe manually erased this search", "attribution": "Disputed forensic interpretation associated with the search artifact; not a claim about every deletion on the phone.", "basis": "Green characterized the artifact as deleted in the first trial.", "counter": "Hyde testified that this search was not manually deleted. Temporary database records and forensic software labels do not by themselves establish a user's action.", "reasoning": "We do not treat a software label as proof of deliberate concealment. The examiner must establish what produced that artifact.", "limits": "This assessment concerns this search only. It does not establish that no messages, calls or other information were deleted.", "references": [ "S13", "S23" ] } ], "analysis": { "title": "The Google search: 6:24 a.m. or 2:27 a.m.?", "scope": "Jennifer McCabe's search, the Safari tab timestamp and the deletion dispute.", "boundary": "The no-manual-deletion statement is Hyde's conclusion about this search, not a finding that McCabe never deleted other information. We have not independently examined the phone extraction.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Hyde and Whiffin placed the Google search, \"hos long to die in cold,\" at 6:24 a.m. Their explanation is that a browser-tab record can pair an earlier tab time with the last page used in that tab. Whiffin's tests show that this time relates to when the tab took focus. It is not necessarily the time the search was typed. That is why they did not read 2:27 a.m. as the time of this query.", "references": [ "S13", "S19", "S52" ] }, { "text": "Hyde also testified that McCabe did not manually delete this search. She explained that a temporary database log can hold records as the phone updates its data. Finding a search there, or seeing it labeled \"deleted\" by forensic software, does not by itself show that someone deliberately erased it.", "references": [ "S13" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "Green's first-trial analysis placed the search at or before 2:27 a.m. and described the artifact as deleted. He disagreed that it was the same search recorded at 6:24 a.m.", "references": [ "S23" ] }, { "text": "On cross-examination, Hyde acknowledged her report did not identify a definitive reason for that artifact's precise 2:27:40 timestamp.", "references": [ "S13" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We find the later-search explanation more convincing because it accounts for the browser's behavior and the other traces of the search, rather than relying on one timestamp. That supports our reading of this search; it does not tell us how John died.", "references": [ "S13", "S19" ] } ] }, "id": "E17", "slug": "e17", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "44245025fa970f64f17d4e076100075fa5dbd843606499b6f4d6225e6a28b1c1", "file_sha256": "56449daf6f70be9159d3720dbcb543ce464f6a80341c9e50ab576a9b95d424fd", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A table explaining search URL parameters, with a 2024 exhibit 618 sticker.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "document_excerpt", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Me3c875b25fdc4b74b3cfd393effb5a96.png", "source_locator": "PDF page 5 of 13; visible 2024 exhibit label 618.", "source_url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-albert-internet-history-evidence614-to-626-667977178497b.pdf", "id": "Me3c875b25fdc4b74b3cfd393effb5a96", "changes": "Complete document page rendered as an image; orientation normalized. Existing marks and redactions retained. No enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 618 explains the components of a search URL. We use this earlier explanatory slide as context for interpreting browser artifacts. It contains no timestamp establishing when the search occurred and does not decide the competing timing interpretations summarized here.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "Bar footage and departure", "summary": "Bukhenik used surveillance footage to describe Read and O'Keefe's evening in Canton.", "references": [ "S06" ], "limitations": "A count of containers served is not a chemical measurement of alcohol consumed. This entry does not convert every visible glass into a finished drink.", "category": "video", "kind": "Video described in testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-28", "time_label": "Evening", "time_basis": "Video presented in testimony", "phase": "bars", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 10, "body": [ "The presentation included drinks being served and Read leaving C.F. McCarthy's carrying a glass before the visit to the Waterfall." ], "people": [ "bukhenik" ], "facts": [], "id": "E18", "slug": "e18", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "8bf814ce8613a80c398f92449e9f058d7926f88a0b69d300f2d70d60251e855c", "file_sha256": "a14903b00bd0de9e38a8617316400ad40b3077e99104911d125b9aa2ed23b62a", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Elevated view of patrons beside a bar, with taps, glassware and stools visible.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "video_frame", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mcef184841c09460b81c64075e777c77e.png", "source_locator": "How many drinks was Read served? Related source-captioned footage; the supplied image is a different frame.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/08/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-thursday-may-8/", "id": "Mcef184841c09460b81c64075e777c77e", "changes": "Supplied image boundaries and pixels retained. Display generated by the standard metadata-stripping pipeline. No enhancement, reconstruction or added identification.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "The bar layout is consistent with the C.F. McCarthy's setting in the cited courtroom reporting. We include this still as context for the evening's chronology. Its exact time and original recording have not been independently verified. A single frame does not establish how much anyone drank, their state of mind, or what happened later.", "rights_label": "Limited reproduction for commentary; original rights holder unverified. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Supplied surveillance still; original rights holder unverified. Linked reporting provides setting context.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The initial snow-covered scene search", "summary": "Gallagher described clearing snow and collecting apparently bloodstained snow in plastic cups.", "references": [ "S18", "S05", "S50" ], "limitations": "The collection method is documented here without treating it as proof either of fabrication or of an unbroken chain of custody.", "category": "investigation", "kind": "Investigation testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Morning", "time_basis": "Investigator recollection", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 135, "body": [ "Questioning addressed the leaf blower, containers, packaging, documentation, and the initial absence of recovered taillight fragments." ], "people": [ "gallagher" ], "facts": [], "id": "E19", "slug": "e19", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "7238eaf6a10ab9464f80243339760974ea3aabb5e8aeede5758d5d4aaf1b22ad", "file_sha256": "94c3a85138eba9cdae09648151c55ebed51d567334245d9f3cf3b68c203e2dba", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Disturbed snow around an exposed dark patch of ground, with an exhibit 20A sticker.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mb6e429630a934c588683f5c714545f88.png", "source_locator": "WCVB first-trial exhibit collection; visible exhibit label 20A.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/karen-read-exhibits-may-3-7-page-03-6644eecba41ef.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Mb6e429630a934c588683f5c714545f88", "changes": "Full publisher-supplied scan retained. Metadata removed; exhibit annotations unchanged.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 20A shows disturbed snow and an exposed patch of ground. We include the full photograph as scene context for the initial-search discussion. It does not date each disturbance, show the collection procedure, or independently establish which items were present before the search.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The first trial ends in a mistrial", "summary": "The first jury did not return a verdict. A mistrial was declared on July 1, 2024.", "references": [ "S20" ], "limitations": "The first mistrial must not be presented as a verdict of guilt or acquittal.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Court outcome", "event_date": "2024-07-01", "time_label": "Mistrial declared", "time_basis": "Court date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 220, "body": [ "The proceedings continued to a second trial." ], "people": [], "facts": [], "id": "E20", "slug": "e20", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "076ce2fcf1bf6a06b2668481433b9765fe9d168cd23724a72c00b2465b99bf38", "file_sha256": "e85729353e035bcf963a108a5f0dbb3e11f791c1c13b585d048d89c7021f7f74", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A press gathering outside court with microphones in front of a speaker and a woman beside him.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mdde71c325e674ad9b3d48577d51fccf1.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.wbur.org/news/2024/07/01/karen-read-mistrial-boston-police", "id": "Mdde71c325e674ad9b3d48577d51fccf1", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Karen Read and attorney David Yannetti outside court after the mistrial on July 1, 2024, as identified in WBUR's caption. We distinguish this procedural outcome from the verdict returned at the 2025 retrial; expressions in this photograph do not establish guilt or innocence.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Steven Senne / AP, via WBUR", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Based on the cited reporting and the research chronology. Not certified transcript verification.", "title": "The June 18, 2025 verdict", "summary": "Read was acquitted of the death-related charges and convicted of operating under the influence.", "references": [ "S01" ], "limitations": "The archive's prosecution-focused selection does not alter the recorded verdict. No entry labels a disputed collision as a judicially established event.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Court outcome", "event_date": "2025-06-18", "time_label": "Verdict returned", "time_basis": "Court date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 320, "body": [ "The jury returned not-guilty verdicts on second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence, and leaving the scene of a fatal collision. It returned a guilty verdict on the lesser OUI offense." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Second-degree murder", "value": "Not guilty" }, { "label": "OUI manslaughter", "value": "Not guilty" }, { "label": "Leaving a fatal collision", "value": "Not guilty" }, { "label": "Operating under the influence", "value": "Guilty" } ], "id": "E21", "slug": "e21", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "7f6a5c6d22aa0b94a8d805808c02512391d2d9647594250bee6591ad1432a873", "file_sha256": "dd9b62daae59608c43ef3d44caba49c9fff76ba27c3d6dfe88ac5317525a69c4", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Three people embracing in a courtroom.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M9576abf96589454ab5557b29e8467453.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/18/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-june-18-jury-deliberations/", "id": "M9576abf96589454ab5557b29e8467453", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Karen Read embraces her parents after the June 18, 2025 verdict, according to the source caption. We use the photograph to mark the courtroom outcome. The returned verdicts, summarized in this record, are the basis for the legal result; a reaction photograph is not a verdict form.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Greg Derr / The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Directions and arrival at Fairview", "summary": "McCabe described giving O'Keefe directions and expecting him to join the gathering.", "references": [ "S19", "S49", "S43" ], "limitations": "These observations are testimony, not a continuous entry-and-exit recording.", "category": "communications", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Trip to Fairview; phone arrival around 12:24 a.m. (Whiffin)", "time_basis": "Witness account; exact interval not verified here", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 15, "body": [ "The reported phone evidence and McCabe's testimony describe contact during the trip from the Waterfall to Fairview.", "McCabe described seeing the Lexus outside and sending parking and arrival messages. She testified that O'Keefe did not enter the house.", "A separate 2024 exhibit lists suggested routes, distances and estimated travel times. We link it as route context only: it is not GPS history, proof of the route actually driven, or a verified arrival time.", "Whiffin placed the phone's arrival outside Fairview at about 12:24 a.m. in the April 28 retrial reporting. This is distinct from the final recorded activity interval around 12:32 a.m. Location accuracy was challenged on cross-examination; neither time gives us a continuous view of John's movements or proves entry into the house." ], "people": [ "mccabe" ], "facts": [], "id": "E22", "slug": "e22", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "fc7c4018d89ca40767c3b3360abf052fcbc63d002c9e4ab9c90db4403196d269", "file_sha256": "3481f4aa38e3b414a461875903e683e86ae3b40db8f3cf87db2f7941cf4d7bb4", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A table of suggested routes, mileage and travel times with a published redaction and exhibit 592 sticker.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "document_excerpt", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mb8c7967f756941db8b2fd3f17a7c04b8.png", "source_locator": "PDF page 1; visible 2024 exhibit label 592.", "source_url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-google-directions-592-667977aa6be80.pdf", "id": "Mb8c7967f756941db8b2fd3f17a7c04b8", "changes": "Complete document page rendered as an image; orientation normalized. Existing marks and redactions retained. No enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 592 lists suggested routes, distances and estimated travel times. We show the table as route context, retaining its published redaction. These are route estimates, not GPS traces, proof of the route actually driven, or verified arrival times.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "id": "E23", "slug": "e23", "title": "The January 28 daytime text exchange", "category": "communications", "kind": "Recorded communications", "summary": "Guarino presented messages about the relationship, arguments, and plans to meet.", "body": [ "Guarino presented earlier January 28 messages containing disagreements, apologies and plans to meet for drinks.", "The same reporting describes Camerano's testimony that the couple greeted each other affectionately at the bar and that he observed no argument or tension there. The messages do not establish a later physical act or intent." ], "limitations": "The content of an argument does not establish a later physical act or intent. This is an attributed summary of the messages, not their full reproduction.", "references": [ "S27" ], "event_date": "2022-01-28", "time_label": "Daytime, before the bars", "time_basis": "Date of messages", "phase": "bars", "on_timeline": false, "timeline_order": 0, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "people": [ "guarino" ], "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "The early-morning calls to friends", "summary": "McCabe and Roberts described calls from Read before O'Keefe was found.", "references": [ "S17", "S19", "S28", "S14" ], "limitations": "The initial calls were not established by an audio recording in this collection. What was said is attributed to the reporting witness; the site does not determine Read's knowledge or memory.", "category": "statements", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Approximately 4:53-5:00 a.m.", "time_basis": "Witness accounts and call records", "phase": "morning", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 80, "body": [ "McCabe placed a call involving Read and O'Keefe's niece at about 4:53 a.m. She described Read as searching for him and initially uncertain about where she had last left him.", "Roberts testified that Read called around 5 a.m. and said O'Keefe was dead. Read's later interview account described fear and uncertainty during the search." ], "people": [ "mccabe", "roberts" ], "facts": [], "id": "E24", "slug": "e24", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "3f69a9d21861b74967a60c5ecdef5b1b48abc9e87846ef029e37032ea087c51f", "file_sha256": "ae7dad893c5225ada511dca7e18f33eaf4ddb26651bee6f28e6841f137276797", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness speaking into a microphone with counsel standing beside the witness stand.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M92d3286896c3477691de4442319cf012.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/22/karen-read-trial-livestream-video-opening-statements/", "id": "M92d3286896c3477691de4442319cf012", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Kerry Roberts being questioned on April 22, 2025. We place this later testimony photograph beside her account of the early-morning calls. It does not show a January 2022 call, establish its exact words, or resolve differences between accounts.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Stuart Cahill / The Boston Herald via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Discovery, 911 call, and attempted aid", "summary": "The women found O'Keefe on the lawn, and the jury heard the ensuing emergency call.", "references": [ "S17", "S25", "S28" ], "limitations": "The discovery and response do not, on their own, identify how the injuries occurred or what anyone knew beforehand. The linked reporting is not a complete emergency-services log.", "category": "communications", "kind": "Recorded communications and testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Around 6 a.m.; discovery and response", "time_basis": "Witness estimates and reported emergency-call playback", "phase": "morning", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 100, "body": [ "Roberts and McCabe described Read calling out that she saw O'Keefe, leaving the vehicle, and approaching him. The women described attempts to assist him.", "McCabe's 911 call was played in court. She reported an unresponsive man in the snow. Responders arrived and O'Keefe was transported to a hospital." ], "people": [ "mccabe", "roberts", "nuttall", "mclaughlin" ], "facts": [], "id": "E25", "slug": "e25", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "788808c1af7ff062fc863e7fc076aa38ba81080285302964f4c6d16453ae66fb", "file_sha256": "59690811f57cf5a72eb8b29e3a1c89debd3d0fe6f7a1cef36d56eee25ca250cb", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness places fingers against his neck while seated at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Md3e496945d634cb2b0b1f2cefcb5c6aa.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/22/karen-read-trial-livestream-video-opening-statements/", "id": "Md3e496945d634cb2b0b1f2cefcb5c6aa", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Paramedic Timothy Nuttall demonstrates checking a carotid pulse during testimony on April 22, 2025. We include the courtroom demonstration as context for the emergency-response account. It is not a photograph of aid being administered to O'Keefe or an independent record of the discovery time.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Stuart Cahill / The Boston Herald via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Hospital alcohol testing and extrapolation", "summary": "Knowles estimated an earlier blood-alcohol range using a later hospital serum result.", "references": [ "S26" ], "limitations": "This was not a sample drawn at Fairview. The estimate depends on conversion and elimination assumptions and does not diagnose a blackout or establish a collision.", "category": "medical", "kind": "Laboratory result and expert calculation", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Morning blood draw; earlier time estimated", "time_basis": "Laboratory time and retrospective estimate", "phase": "morning", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 120, "body": [ "The hospital serum ethanol result was reported as 93 mg/dL. Knowles converted the serum result and calculated an estimated blood-alcohol range of approximately 0.14-0.28 percent at 12:45 a.m.", "Her testimony distinguished a serum test from whole-blood concentration and described assumed elimination rates. Cross-examination addressed her reliance on the hospital's number." ], "people": [ "knowles" ], "facts": [], "id": "E26", "slug": "e26", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "291b71a2fc8fbf64c53b8099f5fa839454339430a30d0e158eef56d129c3b2eb", "file_sha256": "168685445640b07858f2d2c8f49c3f2b38822e36ee82d3f5ca3979fb2aa9024a", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness with glasses speaking at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M5bb5ad36538945de9f876f8d3e34ff2f.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/02/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-2-jennifer-mccabe/", "id": "M5bb5ad36538945de9f876f8d3e34ff2f", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Forensic scientist Hannah Knowles testifying on May 2, 2025. We identify the testimony behind the serum conversion and retrospective estimate. This photograph is not a laboratory result or a measurement of blood-alcohol concentration at the earlier time; the assumptions and range remain in the record.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Mark Jarret Chavous / The Enterprise via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Police contact with the Albert household", "summary": "Witnesses described conversations with household occupants rather than a forensic search of the home.", "references": [ "S25", "S06", "S50" ], "limitations": "Entering a residence to speak with occupants is different from an evidentiary search. Neither the absence of a search nor the conversations establish what happened inside.", "category": "investigation", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Morning", "time_basis": "Witness accounts", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 130, "body": [ "McCabe testified that she entered the house at an officer's request and woke Brian and Nicole Albert, who came downstairs to speak with police.", "Bukhenik acknowledged that he did not search or photograph the interior, secure the yard, or maintain a scene entry log." ], "people": [ "mccabe", "bukhenik" ], "facts": [], "id": "E27", "slug": "e27", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "abe152015e81ced96bf4cf8ce5bf90f2e39ec47f396d9f60f8960e52aef995fd", "file_sha256": "a8a2018dab1a6cac56b5721cc35d9d9e54115f2c6efc3428265e045df63f51f2", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Snow-covered lawn, flagpole and house, with a 2024 exhibit 18 sticker.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M2f5ade1b725349eea079eab83ea9458c.png", "source_locator": "WCVB first-trial exhibit collection; visible exhibit label 18.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/karen-read-exhibits-apr-29-may-2-page-9-6644eecee90c6.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "M2f5ade1b725349eea079eab83ea9458c", "changes": "Full publisher-supplied scan retained. Metadata removed; exhibit annotations unchanged.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "This photograph labeled 2024 exhibit 18 shows the snow-covered exterior and flagpole area in the trial collection. We use it for setting context only. It does not show police interviewing the household or establish what occurred inside, who entered, or whether the interior was searched.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Later searches and evidence-bag documentation", "summary": "Additional material was recovered at Fairview after the initial SERT search.", "references": [ "S06", "S50" ], "limitations": "Later recoveries were not all made during the original search or by the same personnel. This summary is not a complete chain-of-custody audit.", "category": "investigation", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-02-03", "time_label": "February follow-up searches", "time_basis": "Multiple dates; not a single recovery", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 180, "body": [ "Bukhenik was questioned about later searches, report preparation, and the recovery of further plastic pieces in February.", "He distinguished later narrative reports from annotations on evidence bags recording recovery information. The defense questioned delays and documentation." ], "people": [ "bukhenik" ], "facts": [], "id": "E28", "slug": "e28", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "75e90b0a71165b691cf0198d1a33c569174e8ed06084a3fe93f1f2d23c8296e8", "file_sha256": "374b345e8e69a1d9ae1850fee688b93a7681352f0d1cd62f35c579a6e692a71c", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "An evidence bag with handwritten collection details and a 2024 exhibit 328 sticker.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mc6f089afce364f39851664692e23998b.png", "source_locator": "WCVB first-trial exhibit collection; visible exhibit label 328.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/328-to-340-page-01-666d03afad6f2.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Mc6f089afce364f39851664692e23998b", "changes": "Full publisher-supplied scan retained. Metadata removed; exhibit annotations unchanged.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 328 shows an evidence bag whose handwriting records a February 10, 2022 collection and describes glass and plastic fragments. We retain the annotations as documentation to examine. A bag label is not a continuous custody record or independent verification of the recovery account.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Sallyport video orientation and custody testimony", "summary": "The jury examined mirrored surveillance footage and a corrected orientation.", "references": [ "S29" ], "limitations": "An inverted display is a presentation issue, not independent proof of evidence tampering. A camera blind spot also is not a record of an event occurring within it.", "category": "video", "kind": "Video and witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Evening at Canton police headquarters", "time_basis": "Video time and testimony", "phase": "investigation", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 165, "body": [ "A version of sallyport footage shown at the retrial was horizontally inverted. Cross-examination addressed the apparent side of the Lexus and people near its right rear.", "Bukhenik denied observing manipulation of evidence. The corrected orientation, camera coverage, and custody sequence were questioned." ], "people": [ "bukhenik" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Mirrored sallyport footage establishes deliberate concealment", "attribution": "Inference from the video presentation, distinct from the established orientation problem.", "basis": "The mirrored image can mislead a viewer about which side of the SUV is visible.", "counter": "Bukhenik testified that other town cameras also produced inverted images. Mirroring alone does not identify deliberate alteration or a planting act.", "reasoning": "We separate a presentation defect from an allegation about its purpose. We would need evidence connecting the orientation or handling of the video to concealment.", "limits": "The witness's explanation is not independent authentication. Blind spots, missing intervals and handling remain separate questions; correcting orientation does not resolve them.", "references": [ "S29" ] } ], "id": "E29", "slug": "e29", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "acff2f650453b20032ab227d40ef3b264e9ac522897efe5dd8f7b27ac4b264eb", "file_sha256": "50c1d5c57842c5eb558dfd8bfeece7869fb87a90c6f4609da31d60fe449ff291", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A courtroom monitor displaying a snowy parking lot with vehicles.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mb33c480b93384bf595bb315166269ee7.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/12/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-may-12/", "id": "Mb33c480b93384bf595bb315166269ee7", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Courtroom photograph from May 12, 2025, showing footage identified by the source as the Canton Police Department parking lot on January 29, 2022. We distinguish this exterior camera view from the disputed sallyport view. It does not establish uninterrupted custody or resolve the interior video's orientation.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Pat Greenhouse / The Boston Globe", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Vehicle and garment examination", "summary": "Hartnett described collecting material, examining clothing, and testing sampled vehicle areas for blood.", "references": [ "S30", "S45" ], "limitations": "A negative test applies to the areas and method tested. Examination photographs and laboratory findings do not independently date damage or establish the injury mechanism.", "category": "physical", "kind": "Laboratory testimony", "event_date": "2025-05-14", "time_label": "Retrial testimony", "time_basis": "Date of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 240, "body": [ "Hartnett described negative blood-test results from sampled vehicle areas, collection of apparent glass and hair, removal of the taillight housing, and examination of clothing.", "She described marking damaged areas of the sweatshirt and collecting samples and debris. She could not determine when the vehicle damage occurred.", "The accompanying vehicle and sweatshirt photographs come from the 2024 exhibit collection. They illustrate the examination subjects alongside the later testimony summarized here. The garage photograph is not presented as the condition of the taillight before towing, and the garment view does not establish an injury mechanism." ], "people": [ "hartnett" ], "facts": [], "id": "E30", "slug": "e30", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "b6f1235d5aec1d8f6a92e5d2bda0a4ac4a00a91f15fbb18759f38921827c0fac", "file_sha256": "9d4f6ead425a7a58f023ce1ce38a7453ea3b1bbcc649b4e270751a5b8efa802e", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Damaged rear taillight on a dark vehicle inside a garage, with 2024 exhibit sticker 161.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mda9a55dc7bca47cb9a9ca527a8f4f413.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 161.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/161-to-167-page-1-666c75f215a78.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Mda9a55dc7bca47cb9a9ca527a8f4f413", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 161 shows the damaged taillight on a vehicle inside a garage. It accompanies the examination record, not the pre-tow account. Neither this view nor the exhibit sticker dates when the damage occurred.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." }, { "asset_approval_hash": "068fae9adbd66e746c172e55b89d37d9ae8eb1bcf5001bc91fb4a07a9325965a", "file_sha256": "97e63bf807d7319a44498acb61afc1e820bc9bc0660c98891b82ef92412a21e6", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Gray hooded sweatshirt laid flat beside a scale, with 2024 exhibit sticker 192.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "exhibit_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Me4fb33ec44cb4505bea9655222ec3503.png", "source_locator": "WCVB 2024 first-trial collection; visible exhibit sticker 192.", "source_url": "https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/images/192-to-197-page-1-666c7661a6efe.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter%2Ctop&resize=900%3A*", "id": "Me4fb33ec44cb4505bea9655222ec3503", "changes": "Complete publisher-hosted scan retained at its supplied resolution; metadata removed by the editor. No crop, annotation, retouching or generated content.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "2024 exhibit 192 shows a sweatshirt laid out for examination. We retain the full garment and scale rather than isolating one damaged area. This view does not establish the injury mechanism or when any garment damage occurred.", "rights_label": "2024 trial exhibit via WCVB. Limited reproduction for commentary; no ownership or permission claim.", "credit": "2024 trial exhibit scan via WCVB. Original photographer not identified on this copy.", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Higgins: messages and telephone handling", "summary": "Higgins was questioned about communications, movements, and disposal of a phone and SIM card.", "references": [ "S31", "S53" ], "limitations": "These are attributed accounts from the first trial. Phone disposal is not itself a recording of an assault, concealment, or a conversation about O'Keefe's death.", "category": "communications", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2024-05-24", "time_label": "First-trial testimony", "time_basis": "Date of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 205, "body": [ "In the first trial, Higgins described communications with Read, his movements after the gathering, and selected communications extracted from a device.", "Higgins said he threw away his phone, did not wipe it, and might have cut or broken its SIM card if he removed it. Counsel questioned the timing, and Higgins disputed counsel's account of how the items were discarded." ], "people": [ "higgins" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Discarded phones and overnight calls establish a coordinated cover-up", "attribution": "Inference raised by the phone-preservation and communication disputes; no conversation is reconstructed here.", "basis": "Higgins acknowledged discarding a phone; Albert described a trade-in. Overnight calls and the explanations for them were challenged.", "counter": "Those facts do not reveal an agreement or the contents of an alleged conversation. A preservation problem is not itself proof of a particular crime.", "reasoning": "We regard the missing opportunity to verify data as a legitimate investigative concern. We do not fill that gap with an invented conversation.", "limits": "The witnesses' explanations do not settle the concern either. An exact disposal/order chronology requires separating issuance, notification, disposal and retained records. We do not infer coordination solely from timing.", "references": [ "S31", "S53" ] } ], "id": "E31", "slug": "e31", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "d403de9345c7f1ccf5bbae6726b70d58b80b9c24accbb3a9711d7121bc8ff3c8", "file_sha256": "0ad95980015c94edf76c4e36221462cd9942d4a8025c97eaeb29fc60f6fe68b2", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness in a suit seated at the witness stand.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M291b335729c0426d9c20c8d78847f210.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/24/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-24-brian-higgins/", "id": "M291b335729c0426d9c20c8d78847f210", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Brian Higgins testifying on May 24, 2024. We place this first-trial photograph with the account of his communications and telephone handling. It is not an image of an extracted message, the discarded phone, or proof of either side's account of its disposal.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Charles Krupa / AP", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Albert-family accounts and overnight calls", "summary": "Family members described the gathering and denied seeing O'Keefe enter the house.", "references": [ "S32", "S54", "S53" ], "limitations": "A call entry is not a recording of its conversation. A witness's statement about not seeing someone does not substitute for continuous surveillance.", "category": "statements", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2024-05-13", "time_label": "First-trial testimony", "time_basis": "Date of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 200, "body": [ "Brian Albert and family members testified to their observations of the gathering and vehicles outside.", "Brian Albert was questioned about calls involving Higgins and replacing his phone. His explanations were examined separately from the phone records." ], "people": [ "albert", "higgins" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Selling the house or rehoming the dog establishes concealment", "attribution": "Inference from later household decisions; motive is not established by the actions alone.", "basis": "The sale and rehoming have been linked to questions about evidence that investigators could no longer examine in its original setting.", "counter": "Nicole Albert described prior downsizing plans and a later dog incident preceding rehoming. These are alternative accounts, not independently verified motives.", "reasoning": "We cannot infer an evidence-destruction purpose from the decisions alone. An accusation requires a link between the act and the evidence allegedly concealed.", "limits": "The original house was not forensically searched, a real investigative limitation. The household's explanations do not independently settle motive. Basement-renovation details are not established by this review.", "references": [ "S54", "S53" ] } ], "id": "E32", "slug": "e32", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "The snowplow driver's observations", "summary": "Loughran described passes through the area and not seeing a body during an earlier pass.", "references": [ "S33" ], "limitations": "These were recollections, not a complete GPS-verified route. This collection does not identify the owner or occupants of the vehicle he described.", "category": "statements", "kind": "Witness testimony", "event_date": "2022-01-29", "time_label": "Approximately 2:45 and 3:30 a.m.", "time_basis": "Witness estimates", "phase": "overnight", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 70, "body": [ "Loughran placed one pass at about 2:45 a.m. and described a later pass and a Ford Edge near the flagpole.", "Cross-examination addressed his route, timing estimates, visibility, interviews, and vehicle identification." ], "people": [ "loughran" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "The snowplow account and Ford Edge establish a later body placement", "attribution": "Loughran's observations followed by an inference; he did not report witnessing a body transfer.", "basis": "Loughran described seeing no body on an earlier pass and a Ford Edge around 3:30 a.m.", "counter": "The cited account does not identify occupants or establish a transfer. His recollection and observations were challenged on cross-examination.", "reasoning": "We distinguish failure to observe something from proof that it was absent. The vehicle account does not supply the missing transfer evidence.", "limits": "His account is a material challenge and cannot simply be dismissed. Visibility, route and memory affect its weight; this review does not independently reconstruct what he could see.", "references": [ "S33" ] } ], "id": "E33", "slug": "e33", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "ed0abb98cd8104b126a149ec2cb517a12096f4fa1492532df447b0f91f7d66d7", "file_sha256": "8da01c54c52a84740233294c29729ef4f0972c57bf6d85ca91ec93033eb47d52", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness with a reddish beard speaking into a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M8e6a7cbd3c934d08a89558698ef2f2e0.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/04/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-june-4/", "id": "M8e6a7cbd3c934d08a89558698ef2f2e0", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Brian Loughran testifying on June 4, 2025. We use the later courtroom photograph to identify the account discussed here. It does not show the overnight plow route, corroborate the estimated pass times, or establish which vehicle was outside the house.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Greg Derr / The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "summary": "Messages were admitted through a recipient, with a limitation tied to the investigator's state of mind.", "references": [ "S34", "S29", "S44", "S55" ], "limitations": "The admitted messages and the witness's answers are reported separately. The messages do not amount to a judicial finding that physical evidence was fabricated.", "category": "investigation", "kind": "Recorded messages and testimony", "event_date": "2025-06-02", "time_label": "Retrial testimony", "time_basis": "Date admitted through witness", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 280, "body": [ "Jonathan Diamandis, Proctor's childhood friend, authenticated messages containing derogatory comments about Read and early conclusions about the case.", "Diamandis said Proctor had not told him he planted or tampered with evidence or framed Read. The court permitted the messages to be introduced through Diamandis without requiring the defense to call Proctor." ], "people": [ "proctor", "diamandis" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "Proctor's misconduct establishes that he planted evidence", "attribution": "Inference from documented misconduct to a specific unproved act.", "basis": "Proctor's inappropriate communications and disciplinary firing raise legitimate questions about credibility and investigative reliability.", "counter": "Those findings do not themselves identify an act of planting. A specific allegation still needs evidence of access, transfer, alteration or a false recovery account.", "reasoning": "We condemn the misconduct and scrutinize the investigation. We do not treat bad conduct as a substitute for establishing how a particular item was planted.", "limits": "This is not blanket exoneration. An absence of confession proves little, and circumstantial evidence can matter. Each custody problem needs its own assessment.", "references": [ "S55" ] } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we assess Proctor's conduct", "scope": "We distinguish documented misconduct from allegations of evidence planting or a cover-up.", "boundary": "This is our assessment of the cited reporting, not a finding that no contrary evidence exists or an official exoneration. It does not excuse Proctor's conduct, certify every investigative step, or resolve undocumented activity. We will revisit it if further verified evidence changes the assessment.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "Proctor's degrading messages about Read were unacceptable. The early conclusions reflected in them also give us reason to question his impartiality and examine his investigative decisions closely.", "references": [ "S34" ] }, { "text": "The material we have reviewed does not establish that Proctor planted evidence or covered up another person's crime. His messages demonstrate misconduct. Proving those other allegations would require evidence of those actions, not just his hostility toward Read.", "references": [ "S34", "S29", "S44" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "The defense challenged Proctor's proximity to the SUV in the corrected sallyport video, later fragment recoveries, and their documentation. Those concerns deserve examination alongside the messages.", "references": [ "S29", "S44" ] }, { "text": "Diamandis testified that Proctor had not told him he planted or tampered with evidence or framed Read. That answer does not establish that no such conduct occurred.", "references": [ "S34" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We look at the custody records and recovery accounts as well as the messages. Bukhenik said he and Proctor followed the tow truck without a Fairview detour, stayed at the station during the first taillight discovery, and exchanged no items there. That account matters to us, but it is witness testimony, not an independent recording of everyone's access or the later searches.", "references": [ "S29" ] } ] }, "id": "E34", "slug": "e34", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "9ed8d1351c9b909144ed39c4a43f3c47d0211e0633d1ade1943a7aef4c65db24", "file_sha256": "56beb291c289248644cac8f99f0cd7262ac8192db75dd1dd5dd61f033af458fe", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness in a dark suit and striped tie at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mb091e0852dde47abb389139299fae482.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/02/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-june-2/", "id": "Mb091e0852dde47abb389139299fae482", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Jonathan Diamandis testifying on June 2, 2025. We distinguish his testimony about Proctor's messages from an original message record. This photograph contains no message text and does not independently establish evidence tampering or the absence of it.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Pat Greenhouse / The Boston Globe", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Animal-DNA testing of two clothing swabs", "summary": "Kun reported no canine DNA and detected pig DNA in the submitted swabs.", "references": [ "S35", "S36" ], "limitations": "A negative result from submitted swabs is not a test of every possible contact. Detected material was not dated. First-trial evidence is not automatically evidence admitted at the retrial.", "category": "physical", "kind": "Laboratory testimony", "event_date": "2024-05-15", "time_label": "First-trial testimony", "time_basis": "Date of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 202, "body": [ "The first-trial testing concerned two swabs submitted from O'Keefe's clothing. Kun had not tested the wounds or every portion of the garment.", "At the retrial, questioning about the testing prompted an objection and a defense request for a mistrial. The judge rejected that request and allowed the questioning to continue." ], "people": [ "kun" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "The arm injuries establish a dog attack inside the house", "attribution": "A defense medical explanation, with an additional inference about location.", "basis": "Russell favored a dog-related explanation for the arm injuries.", "counter": "Kun found no canine DNA on two submitted clothing swabs. A contrary medical opinion discussed during cross-examination considered an animal bite unlikely while describing the wounds as nonspecific.", "reasoning": "We do not find the wound pattern sufficient to establish a dog, an attacker or an indoor location. The negative testing is relevant, but its scope matters.", "limits": "Two clothing swabs are not comprehensive wound testing. The negative result cannot conclusively exclude a dog encounter, and rejecting that explanation does not establish a vehicle strike.", "references": [ "S35", "S36" ] } ], "id": "E35", "slug": "e35", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "7697ca3de19d077a65452639e88ef013d9e36386d54b6731d2113e6de22a5b1d", "file_sha256": "42264349e054e43c06de024e298cb9935a1e78443b7b980393911ca754b564e4", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness with long hair at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M9317c4790d1349aa9d24a126b3b2c2f3.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/15/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-may-15/", "id": "M9317c4790d1349aa9d24a126b3b2c2f3", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Teri Kun testifying in the first trial on May 15, 2024. We identify the testimony about the submitted clothing swabs. This photograph is not a DNA result and does not enlarge the scope of that testing to the wounds or the entire garment.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Greg Derr / The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "Russell's opinion about the arm wounds", "summary": "Russell attributed the arm-mark pattern to a dog; the prosecution challenged her analysis.", "references": [ "S34", "S36" ], "limitations": "The opinion was disputed expert testimony, not an observed attack. It must not be described as a laboratory identification of the cause or a particular dog.", "category": "medical", "kind": "Expert interpretation", "event_date": "2025-06-02", "time_label": "June 2-3 testimony", "time_basis": "Dates of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 282, "body": [ "Russell based her opinion on photographs, medical material, and pattern recognition. She did not identify a particular animal by DNA.", "Her experience, methods, report wording, and interpretation were addressed in cross-examination. Counsel also discussed a report by John Walsh that regarded an animal bite as unlikely while describing the injuries as nonspecific and lacking enough context to assign a particular cause." ], "people": [ "russell" ], "facts": [], "id": "E36", "slug": "e36", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "d1b3fbdccd720ef97c4fcddb64f07fbd8b6fa8efde3d2661995f060720bd04e9", "file_sha256": "701e52ca4afed8d2724478e7d235cae50726e52e28de838bd712d9b2b643afc9", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "A witness with short gray hair and glasses at a courtroom microphone.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/Mc66c9cb26fd443388ef7b25b1bffdc97.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/03/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-june-3/", "id": "Mc66c9cb26fd443388ef7b25b1bffdc97", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Dr. Marie Russell under questioning on June 3, 2025, following her opinion testimony the previous day. We use this later courtroom photograph alongside the account of her methods and cross-examination. It is not an injury photograph, a DNA finding, or proof of a particular animal or mechanism.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Libby O\u2019Neill / The Boston Herald via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "The appellate decision allowing retrial", "summary": "The Supreme Judicial Court allowed the case to proceed after the first mistrial.", "references": [ "S37", "S51" ], "limitations": "This was a procedural decision, not a determination that Read caused O'Keefe's death. It preceded the June 2025 acquittals.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Court outcome", "event_date": "2025-02-11", "time_label": "Decision issued", "time_basis": "Court date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 225, "body": [ "The February 11, 2025 decision addressed efforts to prevent retrial on two charges based on post-trial reports about jurors' views.", "The opinion distinguished later juror accounts from a verdict returned and accepted in court." ], "people": [], "facts": [], "id": "E37", "slug": "e37", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "bb4ba10fea1b4d540611126050aac316c1e2bd7d5fbfbd65ec33ac4d4f7de9ce", "file_sha256": "463c002fd37c74bf2ecd70daf65e311dc5a0910627546ab766eff0d358601fa2", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "First page of Read v. Commonwealth, SJC-13663, showing the court and decision date.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "document_excerpt", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M1875f93101f04411919fb2f85257def1.png", "source_locator": "PDF page 1 of 35; SJC-13663, decision dated February 11, 2025.", "source_url": "https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/02/karen-read-decision.pdf", "id": "M1875f93101f04411919fb2f85257def1", "changes": "Complete document page rendered as an image; orientation normalized. Existing marks and redactions retained. No enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Cover page of Read v. Commonwealth, SJC-13663, decided February 11, 2025, from a publisher-hosted copy of the opinion. We link the complete decision for its reasoning. The cover identifies the proceeding and date; it is not a factual finding about the cause of O'Keefe's death.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts; PDF copy hosted by Fox News", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "ARCCA retention and the expert-disclosure dispute", "summary": "ARCCA's original federal work and subsequent defense-funded work were separate stages.", "references": [ "S38", "S40", "S12" ], "limitations": "Who retained an expert does not by itself establish the validity of the methods or conclusions. Compensation and disclosure questions must be assessed separately from the testing. This record does not state the outcome of a separate federal investigation.", "category": "reconstruction", "kind": "Reported procedural history", "event_date": "2025-02-21", "time_label": "Pre-retrial proceedings", "time_basis": "Date of reporting", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 230, "body": [ "ARCCA's original testing and report were commissioned through a federal investigation. Its experts later testified in the first trial.", "February 2025 reporting described a dispute over defense communications and compensation. In June testimony, Wolfe distinguished the original federal work from later payments by the defense for time, travel and additional work." ], "people": [ "wolfe", "rentschler" ], "facts": [], "claim_reviews": [ { "title": "ARCCA's federal involvement establishes an official cover-up finding", "attribution": "Broader inference about agency conclusions, distinct from ARCCA's actual expert opinions.", "basis": "ARCCA's initial work was federally commissioned. Its experts offered substantial opinions challenging a vehicle-strike explanation.", "counter": "Federal retention is not an agency finding about another crime. Collision analysis does not identify a person who planted evidence or establish a coordinated cover-up.", "reasoning": "We evaluate the experts' conclusions on their methods and evidence, not on an implied agency endorsement of a different theory.", "limits": "Rentschler's injury and motion opinions remain a serious challenge to a vehicle strike. Distinguishing them from an agency finding does not answer the biomechanics. Later defense funding also does not invalidate the work.", "references": [ "S40", "S12" ] } ], "id": "E38", "slug": "e38", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [] }, { "id": "E39", "slug": "e39", "title": "Read's public account of the side entrance", "category": "statements", "kind": "Public interview", "summary": "Read described watching O'Keefe approach a side entrance before looking at her phone.", "body": [ "The reported August 2023 Nightline account described a driveway approach, attention turning to her phone, waiting, and then leaving.", "The account is a public interview rather than sworn testimony." ], "limitations": "Approaching a door and entering a house are not the same recorded observation. This entry does not infer an unseen movement from the interview.", "references": [ "S15" ], "event_date": "2023-08-22", "time_label": "Nightline interview reporting", "time_basis": "Publication date", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": false, "timeline_order": 195, "facts": [], "featured": false, "publication_status": "published", "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "people": [], "media": [] }, { "review_level": "Source-linked summary", "review_note": "Prepared from the supplied evidence chronology and cited reporting. No primary-source authentication is implied.", "title": "ARCCA test configurations and cross-examination", "summary": "Wolfe described controlled tests; cross-examination examined how their conditions differed from a person.", "references": [ "S40", "S41", "S57", "S12" ], "limitations": "The experiments did not record O'Keefe's actual posture or an active elbow swing. No unverified speed-specific test identifier is supplied here.", "category": "reconstruction", "kind": "Expert interpretation", "event_date": "2025-06-06", "time_label": "June 6 and June 9 testimony", "time_basis": "Dates of testimony", "phase": "trial", "on_timeline": true, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 290, "body": [ "The testing used supported or suspended dummy configurations and compared damage and movement with the case materials.", "Cross-examination addressed arm mass, body configuration, selected speeds, and support conditions. Wolfe defended the conclusions drawn from the experiments.", "The Boston Globe reported taillight breakage during ARCCA's 24 mph arm-impact test.", "Breakage alone is a different question from whether an experiment reproduced the case. Wolfe disputed the correspondence between the tests and the vehicle damage; Rentschler disputed the injury pattern and movement. Welcher's paint demonstration addressed possible contact locations, but it did not measure the forces in a high-speed strike. The competing results must be read with the test configuration and the outcome being compared." ], "people": [ "wolfe", "rentschler" ], "facts": [], "id": "E40", "slug": "e40", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-27", "media": [ { "asset_approval_hash": "8936d1ab50eb57aef64fec755c5bf2223206fe8b19fa45057ac63bc235880eef", "file_sha256": "27b71e25e7bfe5af15d85d070c8f3cce39700600bd2ab745feb6c15de42126af", "rights_basis": "fair_use_reviewed", "alt": "Counsel holding a red-and-clear taillight assembly in a courtroom.", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-26", "kind": "context_photo", "content_warning": "", "src": "assets/evidence/M01fdec12a6cd41b9858f8b2257781f32.png", "source_locator": "Source-captioned photograph in the linked trial report; photograph date and limits stated above.", "source_url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/06/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-june-6/", "id": "M01fdec12a6cd41b9858f8b2257781f32", "changes": "Publisher-supplied frame retained. Orientation normalized and metadata removed; no cropping, enhancement or added annotations.", "reviewed_by": "The Read Record", "status": "approved", "caption": "Alan Jackson holds an assembly identified by the source as a 2021 Lexus SUV taillight while questioning Daniel Wolfe on June 6, 2025. We distinguish this courtroom object from the test apparatus and the case vehicle's recovered assembly. The photograph does not establish the test configuration or validate its results.", "rights_label": "Credited source image used for limited commentary. No permission or ownership claim.", "credit": "Mark Stockwell / The Sun Chronicle via AP, Pool", "rights_note": "Publication basis recorded by The Read Record. Internal review notes are private." } ] }, { "title": "The O'Keefe family's wrongful-death case", "summary": "The family is pursuing a civil case against Read and the businesses behind C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall. It has not reached the scheduled trial.", "references": [ "S59", "S60", "S61" ], "limitations": "There is no civil verdict in the docket we checked. A scheduled trial is not a promised date or a finding of liability. We have not independently reviewed every discovery filing.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Civil proceedings / accountability", "event_date": "2024-08-26", "time_label": "2024-08-26", "time_basis": "Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.", "phase": "aftermath", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 1, "body": [ "The August 2024 complaint alleges that Read caused John's death and that the bars bear responsibility for serving her alcohol. Those are the family's claims, not findings made by this lawsuit.", "A September 15, 2026 scheduling order sets the next major dates. Summary judgment asks the judge whether claims can be decided without a trial; the scheduled hearing does not tell us how the judge will rule.", "Civil claims generally use a different burden from criminal charges: more likely true than not, rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The death-related acquittals remain the criminal outcome. They do not themselves resolve this civil case." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Status at review", "value": "Open \u2014 Plymouth Superior 2483CV00692" }, { "label": "Next step / latest development", "value": "Summary-judgment hearing: November 24, 2026, 10 a.m. Trial scheduled: April 5, 2027, 9 a.m. Local court time; dates may change." }, { "label": "Checked", "value": "October 28, 2026" } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we read this development", "scope": "Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.", "boundary": "Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "We see this case as a separate forum for testing responsibility for John's death. We will examine the evidence it produces; the family's decision to sue is not additional proof of a collision.", "references": [ "S59", "S60", "S61" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "A civil claim can fail even when the plaintiff sincerely believes it, and a lower burden does not guarantee success.", "references": [ "S59", "S60", "S61" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "Our view of the trial evidence stands on the sources already presented. We will distinguish new evidence from repeated allegations and correct our assessment if warranted.", "references": [ "S59", "S60", "S61" ] } ] }, "id": "E41", "slug": "e41", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [] }, { "title": "Read's lawsuit against investigators and witnesses", "summary": "Read's claims against individual investigators and civilian witnesses are being litigated separately in federal court. The public mirror we checked is incomplete as a current-status source.", "references": [ "S62" ], "limitations": "CourtListener's RECAP copy may lag. We cannot infer that nothing has happened since July 14, or describe the current federal outcome as settled from this mirror.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Civil proceedings / accountability", "event_date": "2025-11-25", "time_label": "2025-11-25", "time_basis": "Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.", "phase": "aftermath", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 2, "body": [ "The case reached federal court by removal on November 25, 2025. The docket later records an amended complaint, answers and motions challenging whether claims should proceed.", "At the July 14 hearing, Judge Denise Casper took the operative dismissal motions under advisement. Earlier motions were denied as moot because the complaint had changed. That procedural disposition should not be described as a merits victory for either side." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Status at review", "value": "Federal docket mirror \u2014 Read v. Proctor, 1:25-cv-13588-DJC" }, { "label": "Next step / latest development", "value": "Latest filing displayed: July 14, 2026. Dismissal motions taken under advisement; later PACER activity not independently confirmed." }, { "label": "Checked", "value": "October 28, 2026" } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we read this development", "scope": "Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.", "boundary": "Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "We will test Read's civil allegations against the evidence with the same care we apply to the family's claims. Filing a lawsuit does not establish a cover-up, and seeking dismissal does not establish that every factual allegation is false.", "references": [ "S62" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "Early dismissal can turn on legal sufficiency or protections rather than a full factual trial.", "references": [ "S62" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We will explain the grounds of any verified ruling before using it to assess the underlying account.", "references": [ "S62" ] } ] }, "id": "E42", "slug": "e42", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [] }, { "title": "Proctor's misconduct and professional accountability", "summary": "The POST Commission issued a suspension of Michael Proctor's police certification in December 2025. That official action belongs alongside the documented misconduct already discussed in our evidence review.", "references": [ "S63" ], "limitations": "The order supports the fact of suspension and its stated terms. It does not settle disputed evidence handling or prove or disprove a cover-up. Our earlier misconduct assessment is in record E34.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Civil proceedings / accountability", "event_date": "2025-12-18", "time_label": "2025-12-18", "time_basis": "Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.", "phase": "aftermath", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 3, "body": [ "The order suspended Proctor's certification effective on receipt and barred police duties while the suspension remained in effect. It provided for a hearing and said the suspension would continue until a final decision or revocation of the order.", "This is a professional-discipline action. It is not a ruling that Proctor planted taillight evidence or concealed a killing, and we do not describe it as permanent decertification." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Status at review", "value": "Official suspension order \u2014 POST case 2025-072" }, { "label": "Next step / latest development", "value": "December 18, 2025 order verified. Later disciplinary disposition not independently confirmed." }, { "label": "Checked", "value": "October 28, 2026" } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we read this development", "scope": "Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.", "boundary": "Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "We regard the misconduct as serious and relevant to confidence in the investigation. That judgment does not let us skip the separate question of what evidence supports a specific planting allegation.", "references": [ "S63" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "An investigator's conduct can reasonably make readers scrutinize the work more closely.", "references": [ "S63" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "Closer scrutiny is appropriate. The conclusion still needs to follow the particular evidence, not the investigator's character alone.", "references": [ "S63" ] } ] }, "id": "E43", "slug": "e43", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [] }, { "title": "Witnesses' claims against Read and Kearney", "summary": "Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert and Brian Higgins sued Read and Aidan Kearney over statements and conduct they allege harmed them. The case remains contested.", "references": [ "S64", "S65" ], "limitations": "The original complaint is not the later amended pleading. The docket summary does not establish the contents of private discovery or resolve privilege questions, truth, damages or liability.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Civil proceedings / accountability", "event_date": "2026-04-16", "time_label": "2026-04-16", "time_basis": "Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.", "phase": "aftermath", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 4, "body": [ "The original April 16 complaint alleges defamation and harassment connected with accusations that the plaintiffs were involved in John's death or in framing Read. The Plymouth docket later records answers to an amended complaint and ongoing appellate activity.", "On October 27, the court allowed a motion to compel nonparty attorney David Yannetti to respond to an August 6 document subpoena within ten days. This is a discovery order: it requires a response in the litigation. It is not a finding that any party lied or is liable." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Status at review", "value": "Open \u2014 Plymouth Superior 2683CV00541" }, { "label": "Next step / latest development", "value": "October 27, 2026: court ordered a response to a document subpoena within ten days." }, { "label": "Checked", "value": "October 28, 2026" } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we read this development", "scope": "Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.", "boundary": "Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "These claims matter because public accusations have consequences for the people named. We will keep that concern separate from the evidence about how John died; neither side gains factual credibility simply by suing or being sued.", "references": [ "S64", "S65" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "A lawsuit alleging defamation does not, by itself, establish that the challenged statements were false.", "references": [ "S64", "S65" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "We will distinguish proven statements, disputed allegations and actual rulings, including any material findings against either side.", "references": [ "S64", "S65" ] } ] }, "id": "E44", "slug": "e44", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [] }, { "title": "Read's separate case against the agencies", "summary": "Read also sued the Massachusetts State Police and the Town of Canton. This is a separate state case from her federal claims against individuals.", "references": [ "S66", "S67" ], "limitations": "Our current-status account comes from the docket, while the initial allegations are summarized from reporting. We have not authenticated the full operative pleading or reviewed all submissions.", "category": "proceedings", "kind": "Civil proceedings / accountability", "event_date": "2026-06-04", "time_label": "2026-06-04", "time_basis": "Filing or order date; later developments are dated in the record.", "phase": "aftermath", "on_timeline": false, "featured": false, "timeline_order": 5, "body": [ "NBC Boston reported the new filing in June 2026 and attributed allegations of investigative misconduct to Read. Those allegations are disputed claims, not findings we adopt.", "The case moved from Bristol Superior Court to Plymouth in September. The docket records an October 16 hearing on a Rule 12 motion, a challenge addressed before a trial on the merits. The judge took the matter under advisement." ], "people": [], "facts": [ { "label": "Status at review", "value": "Open \u2014 Plymouth Superior 2683CV00899" }, { "label": "Next step / latest development", "value": "October 16, 2026: Rule 12 hearing held; matter taken under advisement. No later ruling displayed at our check." }, { "label": "Checked", "value": "October 28, 2026" } ], "analysis": { "title": "How we read this development", "scope": "Our assessment of the procedural record, not a judicial finding.", "boundary": "Allegations, procedural rulings and our interpretation remain distinct.", "reasoning": [ { "text": "An agency lawsuit can raise questions that differ from whether a particular person struck John. We will report verified rulings on their own terms and avoid treating every procedural step as proof for either narrative.", "references": [ "S66", "S67" ] } ], "challenge": [ { "text": "A ruling about legal responsibility or the ability to sue an agency may not decide disputed historical facts.", "references": [ "S66", "S67" ] } ], "response": [ { "text": "The reason for the ruling matters. We will link the decision and explain its scope when a verified one is available.", "references": [ "S66", "S67" ] } ] }, "id": "E45", "slug": "e45", "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-28", "media": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "id": "C01", "slug": "c01", "title": "Mansfield text and messages about being with the children", "classification": "Recorded-message comparison", "summary": "A text describing being in Mansfield can be compared with voicemails describing being with the children.", "left": { "date": "January 29, 2022, 1:04 a.m.", "context": "Text presented in the first trial", "text": "The text said Read was back in Mansfield and the children were home alone.", "references": [ "S16" ] }, "right": { "date": "January 29, 2022, 12:59 and 1:10 a.m.", "context": "Voicemails presented in the retrial", "text": "The voicemails described Read as being with O'Keefe's niece and nephew.", "references": [ "S05" ] }, "difference": "The communications describe different circumstances within a short period. They are displayed as paraphrases, not reconstructed transcripts.", "limitations": "The messages do not establish why she sent them, what she remembered, or a continuous record of her location.", "references": [ "S16", "S05" ], "related": [ "E05", "E06" ], "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [] }, { "id": "C02", "slug": "c02", "title": "Affirmative statement or question?", "classification": "Disputed attribution", "summary": "First responders' accounts can be compared with Read's later description of her own words.", "left": { "date": "January 29, 2022; testimony in 2025", "context": "Nuttall and McLaughlin's accounts", "text": "They described hearing affirmative statements that Read had hit O'Keefe.", "references": [ "S17", "S18" ] }, "right": { "date": "August 2023 interview", "context": "Read's public account", "text": "Read described asking whether she could have hit him rather than confessing to a collision.", "references": [ "S15" ] }, "difference": "The disagreement is between attributed words and her later account. It is not two independently recorded admissions by Read.", "limitations": "The sources do not provide a conclusive contemporaneous recording resolving the exact phrasing. The distinction was contested at trial.", "references": [ "S17", "S18", "S15" ], "related": [ "E08" ], "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [] }, { "id": "C03", "slug": "c03", "title": "Unknown taillight cause and an identified driveway contact", "classification": "Different attributed accounts", "summary": "Police-interview testimony and Read's later interview differ in the explanation given for the light.", "left": { "date": "January 29, 2022; recounted at trial", "context": "Bukhenik's account of the Dighton interview", "text": "Bukhenik attributed uncertainty about how the taillight was damaged to Read.", "references": [ "S06" ] }, "right": { "date": "September 2024 ABC interview", "context": "Read's account of the morning search", "text": "Read described telling McCabe and Roberts that she had cracked the light and had just hit her car.", "references": [ "S14" ] }, "difference": "One account attributes uncertainty about the cause; the later interview describes a contact connected with the morning search.", "limitations": "This comparison concerns what was said. Whether driveway contact could cause the upper-light damage is a separate expert dispute, not resolved by an interview.", "references": [ "S06", "S14" ], "related": [ "E09", "E07" ], "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [] }, { "id": "C04", "slug": "c04", "title": "Initial drop-off recollection and later interview account", "summary": "A witness-attributed early account and Read's public description identify different last locations.", "classification": "Different attributed accounts", "left": { "date": "January 29, 2022; recounted at trial", "context": "McCabe's testimony about an early call", "text": "McCabe attributed an initial Waterfall drop-off account and uncertainty about Fairview to Read.", "references": [ "S19" ] }, "right": { "date": "August 2023 interview reporting", "context": "Read's Nightline account", "text": "Read described driving O'Keefe to Fairview and watching him approach a side entrance.", "references": [ "S15" ] }, "difference": "The accounts identify different initial recollections. The first account reaches the reader through a witness; the second is a reported public interview.", "limitations": "This is not proof of deliberate lying, recovered memory, or a particular level of intoxication. Full original context remains relevant.", "references": [ "S19", "S15" ], "related": [ "E24", "E39" ], "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [] }, { "id": "C05", "slug": "c05", "title": "Seeing an approach is not the same as seeing entry", "summary": "Two attributed accounts describe whether entry into the house was observed.", "classification": "Disputed attributed observation", "left": { "date": "January 29, 2022; recounted by Bukhenik", "context": "Police-interview testimony", "text": "Bukhenik testified that Read said she did not see O'Keefe go inside.", "references": [ "S06" ] }, "right": { "date": "May 8, 2025", "context": "Public statement reported by CBS Boston", "text": "Read said she saw him enter.", "references": [ "S39" ] }, "difference": "The police-interview account and the reported later public statement differ about whether she saw entry.", "limitations": "The first account depends on the officer's testimony. The second is a public statement, not trial testimony. This comparison does not decide whether O'Keefe entered.", "references": [ "S06", "S39" ], "related": [ "E39", "E22" ], "publication_status": "published", "updated_on": "2026-10-26", "media": [] } ], "sources": [ { "id": "S05", "title": "O'Hara: SERT search; Guarino: calls and voicemails", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/06/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-may-6/", "published_on": "2025-05-06", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "3:45 p.m. update: Kevin O'Hara; search call, arrival, first recovery, scene security, and suspension of search.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Rechecked the reported 2:32, 4:56, 5:45, and 6:15 times and the search-grid and scene-security testimony. No complete testimony video or original search log authenticated." }, { "id": "S16", "title": "Guarino presents text messages in the first trial", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/06/17/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-june-17/", "published_on": "2024-06-17", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Messages sent after midnight, including 1:04 a.m.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of the overnight messages, including the Mansfield text. Message content does not independently establish location or knowledge." }, { "id": "S15", "title": "Read's Nightline interview: arrival and morning statements", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2023/08/22/heres-what-we-learned-from-the-nightline-segment-on-karen-read/", "published_on": "2023-08-22", "kind": "Interview reporting", "locator": "Arrival at the house and statements after discovery", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported interview accounts of the approach to the house and disputed words. Interview statements are not established events." }, { "id": "S17", "title": "Nuttall and Roberts testify on the opening day", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/22/karen-read-trial-livestream-video-opening-statements/", "published_on": "2025-04-22", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Nuttall and Roberts testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked attributed responder statements, discovery and the early call account. No conclusive contemporaneous recording establishes the disputed wording." }, { "id": "S18", "title": "Gallagher: initial search; McLaughlin: reported statements", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/05/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-may-5/", "published_on": "2025-05-05", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Scene collection and first-responder testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of McLaughlin and Gallagher testimony, documentation and collection limitations. No original recording or physical evidence was authenticated." }, { "id": "S06", "title": "Bukhenik: Dighton interview, vehicle custody, and bar footage", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/08/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-thursday-may-8/", "published_on": "2025-05-08", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 8, 2025, 1:30 p.m. update: opening Dighton observations and vehicle-custody discussion.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked attributed pre-tow damage observations and their context. This reporting-level check does not authenticate original vehicle images or establish the separation time of individual fragments." }, { "id": "S14", "title": "Read's account in an ABC News interview", "publisher": "ABC News / ABC7", "url": "https://abc7.com/post/karen-read-reflects-trial-details-what-she-says-happened-night-boston-police-officer-john-okeefe-was-found-dead/15274172/", "published_on": "2024-09-06", "kind": "Interview reporting", "locator": "Interview account: morning search and cracked taillight", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected the ABC interview article about the morning search and Read's description of the light. Not a review of the entire broadcast or all interviews." }, { "id": "S19", "title": "Whiffin phone-data cross-examination and McCabe testimony", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/29/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-april-29/", "published_on": "2025-04-29", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "April 29, 2025: 1 p.m. Whiffin cross-examination and redirect; 2:20 p.m. location-accuracy discussion.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of phone-location uncertainty and the separate McCabe arrival and early-call accounts. Attribution and clock limits remain; no original data were authenticated." }, { "id": "S39", "title": "Read: public statement after May 8 testimony", "publisher": "CBS Boston", "url": "https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/watch-live-karen-read-trial-day-12/", "published_on": "2025-05-08", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Courthouse statement about seeing O'Keefe enter the house", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the attributed public statement in the linked report. It is not trial testimony or independent verification of entry." }, { "id": "S01", "title": "Verdict and sentencing in the second trial", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/18/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-june-18-jury-deliberations/", "published_on": "2025-06-18", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Verdict and sentence paragraphs; article updated June 20, 2025.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Accessible article reviewed for its reported verdict and sentence. No verdict form or certified transcript was inspected." }, { "id": "S02", "title": "Welcher: reverse-driving data and contact demonstrations", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/27/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-may-27/", "published_on": "2025-05-27", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 27, 2025: 1 p.m. update (trigger data); 4 p.m. update (driveway contact).", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reported speed at recording end, throttle and driveway testimony. Distance wording requires original-exhibit verification; this is not a raw vehicle-data analysis." }, { "id": "S03", "title": "Welcher cross-examination and driveway geometry", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/29/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-thursday-may-29/", "published_on": "2025-05-29", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 29, 2025, 11:30 a.m. update: driveway geometry, suspension assumptions and trigger criteria.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked expert opinion and cross-examination. Reconstructed clearance is not an on-scene measurement; a trigger is not itself collision detection." }, { "id": "S08", "title": "Vallier: physical fits and clothing-debris handling", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/16/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-16/", "published_on": "2025-05-16", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 16, 2025, 12:30 p.m. update: Vallier physical fits and clothing-debris handling.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked laboratory testimony and custody limits; physical fit does not date a break or deposition. No original exhibit authentication." }, { "id": "S10", "title": "Hanley: glass and plastic; Wolf: head-injury testimony", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/21/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-may-21/", "published_on": "2025-05-21", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "1:05 p.m. and 3:05 p.m. updates; Hanley comparisons", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected reporting on plastic consistency, physical fits of scene glass, bumper-glass exclusions, and untested shards. No direct examination of the exhibits." }, { "id": "S11", "title": "Scordi-Bello: autopsy findings and undetermined manner", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/15/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-thursday-may-15/", "published_on": "2025-05-15", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Medical examiner testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported cause and undetermined manner of death, with disputed injury mechanisms. No independent medical examination was performed." }, { "id": "S12", "title": "Rentschler: collision testing and cross-examination", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/11/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-june-11/", "published_on": "2025-06-11", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "ARCCA testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked attributed ARCCA opinions and cross-examination about selected tests and unknown posture. No independent reconstruction was performed." }, { "id": "S13", "title": "Hyde: interpretation of the disputed Safari artifact", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/07/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-may-7/", "published_on": "2025-05-07", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "5 p.m. update; Hyde cross-examination and device handling", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected the tab-time interpretation, disagreement, and incoming data on O'Keefe's phone. This does not verify any current software version." }, { "id": "S21", "title": "DiSogra challenges vehicle-clock synchronization", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/30/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-30/", "published_on": "2025-05-30", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 30, 2025: 11:25 a.m. direct, 1 p.m. cross-examination and 3:30 p.m. follow-up on clock alignment.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked competing timing methods and their assumptions, including limits acknowledged on cross-examination. No independent clock calculation or extraction." }, { "id": "S22", "title": "Burgess explains the vehicle-clock alignment", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/20/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-may-20/", "published_on": "2025-05-20", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "May 20, 2025: 1 p.m. clock-offset cross-examination and 3:05 p.m. redirect.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked proposed alignment and response to challenges. Adjusted trigger-record timing is not a directly measured collision time." }, { "id": "S24", "title": "Laposata and Rentschler discuss injury mechanisms", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/10/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-june-10/", "published_on": "2025-06-10", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Defense medical and biomechanical testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the attributed medical and reconstruction opinions and challenges. The reported expert conclusions do not establish an observed injury sequence." }, { "id": "S29", "title": "Bukhenik on corrected video orientation and vehicle custody", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/12/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-may-12/", "published_on": "2025-05-12", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "4 p.m. update: Bukhenik redirect; towing route, driveway arrival, station presence, and denials of a handoff.", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported 5:30 driveway arrival, no-detour account, and station-presence testimony. This article does not independently establish the 5:35 sallyport-entry time." }, { "id": "S30", "title": "Hartnett: examination of the Lexus and clothing", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/14/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-may-14/", "published_on": "2025-05-14", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Maureen Hartnett testimony; blood tests, garment examination, and taillight removal", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of vehicle and clothing examination and testing limits. Findings do not independently date damage or establish an injury mechanism." }, { "id": "S34", "title": "Diamandis, Proctor messages, and Russell testimony", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/02/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-june-2/", "published_on": "2025-06-02", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "9:10 a.m. ruling, Diamandis testimony, Russell testimony", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected reporting identifying Jonathan Diamandis as Proctor's friend, authentication and denial testimony, and Russell's attributed medical opinion." }, { "id": "S36", "title": "Russell cross-examination, evidentiary ruling, and Barros", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/03/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-tuesday-june-3/", "published_on": "2025-06-03", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "3:45 p.m. update: Nicholas Barros; Dighton condition, later photograph, report detail, and cross-examination.", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked Barros's differing damage description, approximately six-by-three-inch estimate, limited contemporaneous report, and denial of seeing tampering. No original photographs or full testimony authenticated." }, { "id": "S43", "title": "Whiffin: final activity and battery-temperature evidence", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/28/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-april-28/", "published_on": "2025-04-28", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "April 28, 2025, 1:30 p.m. update: Apple Health interval, logging delay and combined-data location opinion.", "rights": "Linked for inspection. No permission to rehost source photographs or video is implied.", "source_tier": "Secondary reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reported activity category and testing limits. No independent phone extraction; test delay is not a case-specific timestamp correction." }, { "id": "S46", "title": "2024 vehicle charts and component photographs: exhibits 593-603", "publisher": "WCVB-hosted trial documents", "url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-car-data-593-to-603-667977ab0aa5c.pdf", "published_on": "", "kind": "Publisher-hosted exhibit scans", "locator": "PDF pages 1-4 of 11, especially page 4, exhibit 596; remaining pages are component photographs.", "rights": "Publisher-hosted source link. Selected excerpts have separate image-specific commentary-use reviews; no general reuse permission claimed.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Visually checked the displayed chart headings, units and calculated total. A 2024 exhibit is not the 2025 Welcher presentation, and the calculations are not independently validated." }, { "id": "S47", "title": "2024 CDR report and vehicle event table: exhibits 590-591", "publisher": "WCVB-hosted trial documents", "url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-vehicle-data-590-to-591-6679783739152.pdf", "published_on": "", "kind": "Publisher-hosted exhibit scans", "locator": "PDF pages 1-4 of 8: CDR report and limitations; page 8: separate event table.", "rights": "Publisher-hosted source link. Selected excerpts have separate image-specific commentary-use reviews; no general reuse permission claimed.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the report type and page 4 event summary, alongside the separate event table. No recorded airbag-module event is not proof that no impact occurred. Native vehicle data were not independently extracted or authenticated." }, { "id": "S04", "title": "Phone data, battery temperature, and location limitations", "publisher": "Associated Press via CNN Newsource / KTVZ", "url": "https://ktvz.com/news/national-world/cnn-national/2025/04/29/cell-phone-data-expert-and-key-witness-take-the-stand-in-retrial-of-karen-read/", "published_on": "2025-04-29", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "April 29, 2025: Did O'Keefe enter the house?", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reported location opinion, low-accuracy qualification and temperature-test comparison. No independent device extraction or controlled replication." }, { "id": "S56", "title": "Ian Whiffin cross-examination, part 2: activity and distance comparison", "publisher": "Commonwealth v. Read / independent transcript archive", "url": "https://www.commonwealthvread.com/trial-2/day/6/ian-whiffin-cross-part-2/", "published_on": "2025-04-29", "kind": "Independent transcript compilation", "locator": "Transcript lines 228-231 and 257-269 (54:02-1:01:05): activity interval, sustained objection and conditional distance comparison.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "Independent transcript compilation", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the independently compiled text, not a certified transcript or underlying extraction. The 72-foot proposition appears in questioning and is not treated as an independently authenticated survey." }, { "id": "S58", "title": "Whiffin's battery-temperature table shown in the retrial", "publisher": "Law&Crime Trials", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF-_a161dss&t=8046s", "published_on": "2025-04-30", "kind": "Courtroom video", "locator": "April 28, 2025 testimony; video 2:14:06, January 29 battery-temperature table.", "rights": "One credited broadcast frame for discussion of the displayed evidence; no permission or ownership claim.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-27", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Visual check of the displayed January 29 rows at 2:14:06. This is a broadcast image of the presentation, not the original forensic extraction. No rows shown between 1:36 and 6:06 a.m.; readings later rise after the 6:14 low." }, { "id": "S07", "title": "Barros describes the taillight he observed in Dighton", "publisher": "ABC6", "url": "https://www.abc6.com/dighton-police-sergeant-testifies-on-damaged-taillight-in-karen-read-retrial/", "published_on": "2025-06-03", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "June 3 report: Barros's description of the taillight before towing.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "The article reports pre-tow damage and the defense's comparison with later damage. It does not supply a measured missing-area dimension or a full transcript of Barros's testimony." }, { "id": "S42", "title": "Bukhenik redirect: sallyport entry and movements", "publisher": "Commonwealth v. Read independent archive", "url": "https://www.commonwealthvread.com/trial-2/day/14/yuri-bukhenik-redirect/", "published_on": "2025-05-12", "kind": "Independent transcript compilation", "locator": "Redirect lines 103-104 and 129-149; clock references at playback 5:05:02-5:05:22 and 5:07:12-5:08:00.", "rights": "Linked for inspection. No permission to rehost source photographs or video is implied.", "source_tier": "Independent transcript compilation", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Independent compilation, not certified. Compared the approximate entry recollection with later video-timestamp questioning. Linked courtroom/caption frames were inspected; surveillance-clock alignment and independent audio transcription remain unverified." }, { "id": "S44", "title": "Bukhenik: sallyport cross-examination and later recoveries", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/09/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-9/", "published_on": "2025-05-09", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Cross-examination on sallyport access, later fragment collection, envelopes, and missing contemporaneous location documentation.", "rights": "Linked for inspection. No permission to rehost source photographs or video is implied.", "source_tier": "Secondary reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of the defense challenge and later recovery/documentation issues. No evidence-envelope originals or full testimony authenticated." }, { "id": "S45", "title": "2024 trial exhibit photographs and document collection", "publisher": "WCVB", "url": "https://www.wcvb.com/article/karen-read-murder-trial-see-read-evidence-shown-to-jurors-in-courtroom/60793160", "published_on": "2024-06-24", "kind": "Publisher-hosted exhibit scans", "locator": "Visible exhibit stickers 114, 161, 192, 392, 395 and 403 in the 2024 gallery.", "rights": "Publisher-hosted source link. Selected excerpts have separate image-specific commentary-use reviews; no general reuse permission claimed.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Selected scans visually checked against their visible exhibit labels and captions. These are publisher-hosted copies from the first trial; original capture times, admission details and chain of custody are not independently authenticated." }, { "id": "S09", "title": "Laboratory DNA and mitochondrial-hair testimony", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/19/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-may-19/", "published_on": "2025-05-19", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Laboratory witness testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reported hair and taillight-sample DNA testimony. Neither result dates deposition; maternal-line consistency is not individual identification." }, { "id": "S23", "title": "Green's first-trial interpretation of the search timestamp", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/06/21/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-june-21/", "published_on": "2024-06-21", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Richard Green testimony", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the attributed first-trial search-timestamp interpretation and challenges. No independent phone extraction or current software validation was performed." }, { "id": "S48", "title": "2024 browser-artifact tables and explanatory slides: exhibits 614-626", "publisher": "WCVB-hosted trial documents", "url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-albert-internet-history-evidence614-to-626-667977178497b.pdf", "published_on": "", "kind": "Publisher-hosted exhibit scans", "locator": "13-page PDF; browser-history/search-artifact tables and explanations, particularly pages 1-9.", "rights": "Publisher-hosted source link. Selected excerpts have separate image-specific commentary-use reviews; no general reuse permission claimed.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Visually checked the artifact/table types. The article links this same file under two different labels; it is not a Read/O'Keefe message conversation. Device attribution and timestamp meaning must not be inferred from the filename. No independent phone extraction was performed." }, { "id": "S52", "title": "BrowserState.db last_viewed_time? (Again)", "publisher": "Ian Whiffin / DoubleBlak", "url": "https://www.doubleblak.com/blogPost.php?k=browserstate2", "published_on": "2024-07-02", "kind": "Examiner technical testing", "locator": "Revised September 9, 2024; iOS15 and above tests, Tab Focus and Scenarios.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the author's tab-focus tests and URL/timestamp distinction. This is his testing, not independent authentication of the case extraction." }, { "id": "S50", "title": "Additional 2024 scene and evidence-packaging photographs", "publisher": "WCVB", "url": "https://www.wcvb.com/article/karen-read-murder-trial-see-read-evidence-shown-to-jurors-in-courtroom/60793160", "published_on": "2024-06-24", "kind": "Reproduced trial exhibits", "locator": "Visible first-trial exhibit labels 18, 20A and 328.", "rights": "Source link; selected image use has a separate private review. No blanket rights claim.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Visual review of the three full scans and their visible labels. Scene photographs supply setting context; the bag annotation is not independent proof of recovery or complete custody." }, { "id": "S20", "title": "First trial ends without a verdict", "publisher": "WBUR", "url": "https://www.wbur.org/news/2024/07/01/karen-read-mistrial-boston-police", "published_on": "2024-07-01", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Mistrial announcement", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to its reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported mistrial and jury impasse. This was not a returned verdict of guilt or acquittal." }, { "id": "S49", "title": "2024 suggested-route mileage and time table: exhibit 592", "publisher": "WCVB-hosted trial documents", "url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-google-directions-592-667977aa6be80.pdf", "published_on": "", "kind": "Publisher-hosted exhibit scan", "locator": "One-page PDF, visible exhibit sticker 592; suggested routes, distances and estimated times.", "rights": "Publisher-hosted source link. Selected excerpts have separate image-specific commentary-use reviews; no general reuse permission claimed.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the table type and headings. This is a suggested-route calculation, not actual GPS history or proof of a route taken. The complete document is linked at its publisher and not copied into reader downloads." }, { "id": "S27", "title": "Guarino presents the January 28 relationship messages", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/24/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-thursday-april-24/", "published_on": "2025-04-24", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Guarino testimony about the daytime text-message exchange", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of the messages and affectionate bar interaction. These accounts do not establish a later physical act or intent." }, { "id": "S28", "title": "Roberts and Whitley describe the morning response", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/23/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-april-23/", "published_on": "2025-04-23", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Kerry Roberts testimony and cross-examination; Daniel Whitley testimony", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the attributed discovery, aid and early-call accounts. Witness recollections are not independent recordings of those calls." }, { "id": "S25", "title": "McCabe: morning calls, discovery, and emergency response", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/30/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-april-30-jennifer-mccabe/", "published_on": "2025-04-30", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "10:30 a.m. update; 911 audio and McCabe testimony", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected reporting on the emergency call, the entry into the Albert home, and statements attributed to Read. Not a certified transcript." }, { "id": "S26", "title": "Knowles: serum conversion and retrospective alcohol estimate", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/05/02/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-2-jennifer-mccabe/", "published_on": "2025-05-02", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Hannah Knowles testimony: serum conversion and extrapolation", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Inspected the reported serum result, conversion, elimination assumptions, and cross-examination. Not independent medical validation." }, { "id": "S31", "title": "Higgins: communications, phone handling, and movements", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/24/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-24-brian-higgins/", "published_on": "2024-05-24", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "First-trial testimony of Brian Higgins", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the attributed phone-disposal and qualified SIM-card answers. Disposal does not independently establish an assault or concealment." }, { "id": "S53", "title": "Brian Albert testimony: phone trade-in, calls and house search", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/13/livestream-brian-alberts-testimony-continues-in-karen-read-murder-trial/", "published_on": "2024-05-13", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "1 p.m. update: cellphone trade-in and calls; basement and lack of forensic search questions.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked attributed trade-in, overnight-call and house-search accounts. First-trial reporting, not independent verification of motive or a certified transcript." }, { "id": "S32", "title": "Albert-family testimony in the first trial", "publisher": "Boston 25 News", "url": "https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/live-video-updates-albert-family-members-take-witness-stand-day-10-karen-read-murder-trial/56BOJFYL7BHV3GJWHR53Y75E7Y/", "published_on": "2024-05-13", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Testimony of Brian Albert and family members", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported household accounts, calls and phone replacement. Call entries are not recordings of conversations." }, { "id": "S54", "title": "Albert testimony: house sale and dog rehoming", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/10/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-may-10/", "published_on": "2024-05-10", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "1 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. updates: Nicole Albert on prior sale plans and later dog incident/rehoming.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked attributed explanations for house sale and dog rehoming. These accounts do not independently establish motive." }, { "id": "S33", "title": "Snowplow driver Brian Loughran testifies", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/04/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-june-4/", "published_on": "2025-06-04", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Loughran testimony and cross-examination about route, timing, and observations", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported route estimates and observations. No complete independently verified route or vehicle ownership is established." }, { "id": "S55", "title": "Lead investigator in Karen Read case fired following misconduct investigation", "publisher": "Associated Press", "url": "https://apnews.com/article/dd539babdc2f5509a81be9dbed0967ad", "published_on": "2025-03-19", "kind": "Disciplinary reporting", "locator": "March 19, 2025 report: termination following internal affairs investigation and inappropriate communications.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reported termination and communications misconduct. This is not a finding that evidence was planted or a determination clearing every aspect of the investigation." }, { "id": "S35", "title": "Kun: animal-DNA tests of submitted clothing swabs", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2024/05/15/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-wednesday-may-15/", "published_on": "2024-05-15", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "First-trial testimony of Teri Kun about submitted swabs", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of two submitted swabs and species-test limits. This was not testing of every garment area or of the wounds." }, { "id": "S37", "title": "Read v. Commonwealth: retrial decision", "publisher": "Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court / FindLaw", "url": "https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ma-supreme-judicial-court/116922752.html", "published_on": "2025-02-11", "kind": "Court opinion", "locator": "Court opinion on retrial following the July 2024 mistrial", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reproduced judicial opinion and procedural holding. This is not docket authentication or a determination of the cause of death." }, { "id": "S51", "title": "Read v. Commonwealth: reproduced slip opinion PDF", "publisher": "Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts; copy hosted by Fox News", "url": "https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/02/karen-read-decision.pdf", "published_on": "2025-02-11", "kind": "Reproduced judicial opinion", "locator": "SJC-13663; cover page and opening reasoning, PDF pages 1-4.", "rights": "Source link; selected image use has a separate private review. No blanket rights claim.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Court identifier, date and opening reasoning checked against the reproduced decision already cited as S37. Publisher-hosted copy, not a certified court download; cover alone is not a factual ruling on the death." }, { "id": "S38", "title": "ARCCA retention and expert-disclosure proceedings", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/02/21/karen-read-judge-defense-handling-arcca-expert-witnesses/", "published_on": "2025-02-21", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Discussion of original federal retention and later defense work", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of original retention and the later disclosure dispute. The article does not settle the payment timeline or validate expert methods." }, { "id": "S40", "title": "Wolfe presents ARCCA tests in the retrial", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/06/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-friday-june-6/", "published_on": "2025-06-06", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Daniel Wolfe testimony; tests, damage, and comparisons", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of ARCCA tests, compensation and cross-examination. Selected experimental configurations do not establish actual movement." }, { "id": "S41", "title": "Wolfe cross-examination about test configurations", "publisher": "Boston.com", "url": "https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/06/09/karen-read-murder-trial-livestream-video-monday-june-9/", "published_on": "2025-06-09", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "Cross-examination concerning dummy characteristics, support, and test assumptions", "rights": "Link only. No publisher video, photograph, or article is rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked reporting of disputed dummy properties, scaling and clothing assumptions. No independent replication or actual posture is established." }, { "id": "S57", "title": "June 6 retrial coverage", "publisher": "The Boston Globe", "url": "https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/06/06/metro/karen-read-trial-live-updates/", "published_on": "2025-06-06", "kind": "Courtroom reporting", "locator": "1:01 p.m. update: 24 mph test.", "rights": "Link only. Publisher retains rights to reporting and media.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-26", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the reported test result. This is reporting, not independent authentication of the experiment." }, { "id": "S59", "title": "O'Keefe family civil case: Plymouth Superior docket", "publisher": "Massachusetts Trial Court", "url": "https://www.masscourts.org/", "published_on": "2026-10-16", "kind": "Public court docket", "locator": "Plymouth Superior 2483CV00692; September 15, 2026 scheduling order, paper 189; October 15-16 entries.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Direct public-docket check on October 28: open case, August 26, 2024 filing, November 24 Rule 56 hearing and April 5, 2027 trial. Dates can change. The portal requires a case-number search; this is not a certified docket." }, { "id": "S60", "title": "O'Keefe family wrongful-death complaint", "publisher": "Plymouth Superior Court / copy hosted by Boston magazine", "url": "https://www.bostonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/10/okeefesuit.pdf", "published_on": "2024-08-26", "kind": "Civil complaint", "locator": "Pages 1-5, caption and allegations, including paragraphs 25-37.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Read the complaint caption and opening allegations about the bars and vehicle. This verifies what the plaintiffs alleged, not whether those allegations are true. Later pleadings may refine the claims." }, { "id": "S61", "title": "Civil burden of proof: Superior Court model instruction", "publisher": "Massachusetts Trial Court", "url": "https://www.mass.gov/doc/superior-court-model-civil-jury-instructions-precharge-script-pdf/download", "published_on": "", "kind": "Model jury instruction", "locator": "Precharge script, page 6: preponderance of the evidence.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the civil preponderance explanation. Used only to explain the ordinary civil burden, not as the actual instructions or a prediction in these cases." }, { "id": "S62", "title": "Read v. Proctor: federal docket mirror", "publisher": "U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts / CourtListener RECAP", "url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71963176/read-v-proctor/", "published_on": "2026-07-14", "kind": "Court docket mirror", "locator": "1:25-cv-13588-DJC; entry 1 (removal), entries 61-65, and entry 88 (July 14, 2026 hearing).", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Directly read both pages of the RECAP docket on October 28. Entry 88 takes operative dismissal motions under advisement; older motions were moot after amendment. Latest filing displayed was July 14. This mirror may omit later activity; current PACER status was not independently checked." }, { "id": "S63", "title": "Michael Proctor: POST certification suspension order", "publisher": "Massachusetts POST Commission", "url": "https://mapostcommission.gov/proctor-michael-suspension/", "published_on": "2025-12-18", "kind": "Official suspension order", "locator": "Case 2025-072; December 18, 2025 order, pages 1-3.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked the official three-page order: immediate suspension on receipt, no police duties while suspended, duration until final decision or revocation and hearing rights. This is a suspension order, not a permanent decertification or a finding about planted evidence. Later disciplinary disposition not independently confirmed." }, { "id": "S64", "title": "McCabe and others v. Read and Kearney: Plymouth docket", "publisher": "Massachusetts Trial Court", "url": "https://www.masscourts.org/", "published_on": "2026-10-27", "kind": "Public court docket", "locator": "Plymouth Superior 2683CV00541; September 15 orders 74-75; September 30 answers 84-85; October 27 order 92.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Direct October 28 docket check: open case; denied stays, answers, appellate activity, and order allowing motion to compel nonparty David Yannetti to respond to August 6 document subpoena within ten days. No liability finding inferred. June 1 Plymouth filing is a transfer, not the original complaint date." }, { "id": "S65", "title": "Witnesses' civil complaint against Read and Kearney", "publisher": "Barnstable Superior Court / copy hosted by WCVB", "url": "https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/read-witnesses-sue-69e1397d760ba.pdf", "published_on": "2026-04-16", "kind": "Civil complaint", "locator": "Pages 1-2, caption and paragraphs 1-3.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Checked original complaint identifying Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert and Brian Higgins and their allegations against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. This is the initial complaint, not the later amended pleading and not a court finding." }, { "id": "S66", "title": "Read v. Massachusetts State Police and Town of Canton: docket", "publisher": "Massachusetts Trial Court", "url": "https://www.masscourts.org/", "published_on": "2026-10-16", "kind": "Public court docket", "locator": "Plymouth Superior 2683CV00899, transferred from Bristol 2673CV00489; September 21 and October 16, 2026 entries.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "primary", "review_status": "primary_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Direct October 28 check: open transferred case; October 16 Rule 12 hearing held and taken under advisement. No subsequent decision displayed at this check. Transfer date is not original filing date." }, { "id": "S67", "title": "Read discusses new lawsuit against agencies", "publisher": "NBC Boston", "url": "https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/its-not-done-yet-karen-read-speaks-about-new-lawsuit-on-today/3960548/", "published_on": "2026-06-05", "kind": "News report", "locator": "June 5 report on the lawsuit filed the previous day against Massachusetts State Police and Canton.", "rights": "Link only; no full document or private discovery rehosted.", "source_tier": "reporting", "review_status": "reporting_passage_checked", "checked_on": "2026-10-28", "checked_by": "The Read Record", "review_scope": "Reporting passage checked for filing date and attribution of Read's allegations. Used with the primary docket for later procedure; not verification of alleged corruption or a reading of the full operative complaint." } ], "changes": [ { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "Read's separate case against the agencies", "detail": "Added a sourced After the Verdict update with status, interpretation and limits." }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "Witnesses' claims against Read and Kearney", "detail": "Added a sourced After the Verdict update with status, interpretation and limits." }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "Proctor's misconduct and professional accountability", "detail": "Added a sourced After the Verdict update with status, interpretation and limits." }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "Read's lawsuit against investigators and witnesses", "detail": "Added a sourced After the Verdict update with status, interpretation and limits." }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "The O'Keefe family's wrongful-death case", "detail": "Added a sourced After the Verdict update with status, interpretation and limits." }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "title": "The phone battery-temperature record", "detail": "Added a sourced courtroom image of the battery-temperature table, with the overnight recording gap identified." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Directions and arrival at Fairview", "detail": "Clarified the overnight chronology during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Overnight calls, texts, and voicemails", "detail": "Clarified the overnight chronology during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The phone battery-temperature record", "detail": "Clarified the overnight chronology during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The reconstructed taillight", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The taillight before towing", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The driveway contact on Ring video", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The recorded reverse maneuver", "detail": "Clarified commentary and its limits during the prelaunch review." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "ARCCA test configurations and cross-examination", "detail": "Added source-linked testimony context after checking an earlier research chronology." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "detail": "Added source-linked testimony context after checking an earlier research chronology." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The recorded reverse maneuver", "detail": "Clarified our editorial view and its strongest challenges." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "ARCCA retention and the expert-disclosure dispute", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Animal-DNA testing of two clothing swabs", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The snowplow driver's observations", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Albert-family accounts and overnight calls", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Higgins: messages and telephone handling", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Sallyport video orientation and custody testimony", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Read's phone reconnects to home Wi-Fi", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "detail": "Added a sourced claim assessment with counterevidence, our reasoning and material limitations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "Explained the Google query time, earlier Safari tab timestamp and Hyde no-user-deletion opinion, preserving the expert dispute." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Autopsy findings and injury mechanisms", "detail": "Clarified the substance of competing expert testimony that the previous summary described too vaguely." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "ARCCA testing and disputed biomechanics", "detail": "Clarified the substance of competing expert testimony that the previous summary described too vaguely." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "detail": "Added our assessment of Proctor conduct, separating documented misconduct from unestablished planting and cover-up allegations and retaining contrary considerations." }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "detail": "Clarified our interpretation of the final recorded phone movement after arrival, preserving source qualifications and distinguishing inference from physical impossibility." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The appellate decision allowing retrial", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Directions and arrival at Fairview", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Later searches and evidence-bag documentation", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Police contact with the Albert household", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The initial snow-covered scene search", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "ARCCA test configurations and cross-examination", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Russell's opinion about the arm wounds", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Animal-DNA testing of two clothing swabs", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The snowplow driver's observations", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Higgins: messages and telephone handling", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Sallyport video orientation and custody testimony", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Hospital alcohol testing and extrapolation", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Discovery, 911 call, and attempted aid", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The early-morning calls to friends", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The June 18, 2025 verdict", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The first trial ends in a mistrial", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Statements reported by first responders", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "O'Keefe's final overnight Apple Health activity", "detail": "Added dated source-linked visual context; existing account, interpretation and limitations retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Bar footage and departure", "detail": "Added a supplied bar still with explicit provenance and single-frame limitations; existing account retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Vehicle and garment examination", "detail": "Clarified image locators using the visible 2024 exhibit labels." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The reconstructed taillight", "detail": "Clarified image locators using the visible 2024 exhibit labels." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "detail": "Clarified image locators using the visible 2024 exhibit labels." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Directions and arrival at Fairview", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Vehicle and garment examination", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The reconstructed taillight", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The recorded reverse maneuver", "detail": "Added selected 2024 exhibit context, source links and reviewed visuals; existing limits and interpretation retained." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "ARCCA test configurations and cross-examination", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Read's public account of the side entrance", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "ARCCA retention and the expert-disclosure dispute", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The appellate decision allowing retrial", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Russell's opinion about the arm wounds", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Animal-DNA testing of two clothing swabs", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Proctor's messages and their admission at the retrial", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The snowplow driver's observations", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Albert-family accounts and overnight calls", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Higgins: messages and telephone handling", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Vehicle and garment examination", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Sallyport video orientation and custody testimony", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Later searches and evidence-bag documentation", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Police contact with the Albert household", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Hospital alcohol testing and extrapolation", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Discovery, 911 call, and attempted aid", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The early-morning calls to friends", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The January 28 daytime text exchange", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Directions and arrival at Fairview", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The June 18, 2025 verdict", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The first trial ends in a mistrial", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The initial snow-covered scene search", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Bar footage and departure", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The disputed Safari search timestamp", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "ARCCA testing and disputed biomechanics", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The blue-paint contact demonstration", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Autopsy findings and injury mechanisms", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "DNA and the hair from the Lexus", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Clothing debris and glass comparisons", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The reconstructed taillight", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The taillight recovery timeline", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The taillight before towing", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "Statements reported by first responders", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "title": "The driveway contact on Ring video", "detail": "First reader publication with source attribution, material limitations and separate editorial interpretation." } ], "meta": { "name": "The Read Record", "version": "1.4-editorial-review", "coverage_end": "2025-06-18" }, "support": { "enabled": false, "mode": "disabled" }, "people": [ { "id": "wolf", "name": "Aizik Wolf", "role": "Neurosurgeon and expert witness", "records": [ "E14" ] }, { "id": "rentschler", "name": "Andrew Rentschler", "role": "ARCCA biomechanics witness", "records": [ "E16", "E38", "E40" ] }, { "id": "vallier", "name": "Ashley Vallier", "role": "Laboratory physical-match witness", "records": [ "E11" ] }, { "id": "albert", "name": "Brian Albert", "role": "Homeowner at the time and trial witness", "records": [ "E32" ] }, { "id": "higgins", "name": "Brian Higgins", "role": "Witness to communications and movements", "records": [ "E31", "E32" ] }, { "id": "loughran", "name": "Brian Loughran", "role": "Snowplow driver and witness", "records": [ "E33" ] }, { "id": "hanley", "name": "Christina Hanley", "role": "Laboratory material-comparison witness", "records": [ "E12" ] }, { "id": "wolfe", "name": "Daniel Wolfe", "role": "ARCCA reconstruction witness", "records": [ "E16", "E38", "E40" ] }, { "id": "laposata", "name": "Elizabeth Laposata", "role": "Forensic-pathology witness", "records": [ "E14" ] }, { "id": "knowles", "name": "Hannah Knowles", "role": "Alcohol-analysis witness", "records": [ "E26" ] }, { "id": "whiffin", "name": "Ian Whiffin", "role": "Digital-forensics witness", "records": [ "E02", "E03", "E17" ] }, { "id": "scordi", "name": "Irini Scordi-Bello", "role": "Medical examiner", "records": [ "E14" ] }, { "id": "mccabe", "name": "Jennifer McCabe", "role": "Witness to communications and the morning search", "records": [ "E04", "E08", "E22", "E24", "E25", "E27" ] }, { "id": "hyde", "name": "Jessica Hyde", "role": "Digital-forensics witness", "records": [ "E17" ] }, { "id": "diamandis", "name": "Jonathan Diamandis", "role": "Recipient who authenticated messages", "records": [ "E34" ] }, { "id": "welcher", "name": "Judson Welcher", "role": "Prosecution reconstruction witness", "records": [ "E01", "E07", "E15" ] }, { "id": "miyasako", "name": "Karl Miyasako", "role": "Mitochondrial-DNA witness", "records": [ "E13" ] }, { "id": "mclaughlin", "name": "Katie McLaughlin", "role": "Emergency responder and witness", "records": [ "E08", "E25" ] }, { "id": "roberts", "name": "Kerry Roberts", "role": "Witness to the morning search and response", "records": [ "E24", "E25" ] }, { "id": "ohara", "name": "Kevin O'Hara", "role": "SERT search witness", "records": [ "E10" ] }, { "id": "russell", "name": "Marie Russell", "role": "Defense medical witness", "records": [ "E36" ] }, { "id": "disogra", "name": "Matthew DiSogra", "role": "Defense vehicle-data witness", "records": [ "E01" ] }, { "id": "hartnett", "name": "Maureen Hartnett", "role": "Crime-laboratory witness", "records": [ "E30" ] }, { "id": "proctor", "name": "Michael Proctor", "role": "Investigator whose conduct was examined at trial", "records": [ "E34" ] }, { "id": "barros", "name": "Nicholas Barros", "role": "Dighton officer and witness", "records": [ "E09", "E10" ] }, { "id": "guarino", "name": "Nicholas Guarino", "role": "Investigator presenting phone evidence", "records": [ "E05", "E06", "E23" ] }, { "id": "gallagher", "name": "Paul Gallagher", "role": "Canton scene-search witness", "records": [ "E19" ] }, { "id": "green", "name": "Richard Green", "role": "Defense digital-forensics witness", "records": [ "E17" ] }, { "id": "burgess", "name": "Shanon Burgess", "role": "Vehicle-data witness", "records": [ "E01" ] }, { "id": "kun", "name": "Teri Kun", "role": "Animal-DNA laboratory witness", "records": [ "E35" ] }, { "id": "nuttall", "name": "Timothy Nuttall", "role": "Emergency responder and witness", "records": [ "E08", "E25" ] }, { "id": "bukhenik", "name": "Yuriy Bukhenik", "role": "State Police investigator and witness", "records": [ "E09", "E10", "E18", "E27", "E28", "E29" ] } ], "topics": [ { "id": "digital-timeline", "title": "The electronic timeline", "summary": "Device records, clock alignment, and reported communications.", "note": "Keep the recorded artifact, the proposed clock alignment, and the interpretation separate. These entries do not produce an automatic collision timeline.", "records": [ "E22", "E04", "E01", "E02", "E03", "E05", "E06", "E17" ] }, { "id": "taillight-and-custody", "title": "The taillight and its custody", "summary": "Start with our recovery-timeline assessment, then inspect the underlying observations and comparisons.", "note": "Read the observations in time order. A description of damage is not a timestamp for when each fragment separated.", "records": [ "E10", "E09", "E07", "E29", "E28", "E11", "E12", "E13", "E30" ] }, { "id": "injuries-and-testing", "title": "Injuries and reconstruction", "summary": "Autopsy findings, medical interpretations, and controlled tests.", "note": "Separate recorded injury findings from proposed mechanisms. Read the conflicting interpretations and test limitations together.", "records": [ "E14", "E15", "E16", "E38", "E40", "E35", "E36" ] }, { "id": "communications-and-accounts", "title": "Communications and accounts", "summary": "Recorded messages, public interviews, and statements reported by witnesses.", "note": "An attributed paraphrase is not an audio recording. A changed explanation and a direct contradiction are not automatically the same thing.", "records": [ "E23", "E04", "E06", "E24", "E08", "E39", "E31", "E32" ] }, { "id": "investigation", "title": "The investigation", "summary": "The response, collection methods, documentation, and investigator conduct.", "note": "Follow who described each action and which records support it. This collection does not infer missing events to fill gaps.", "records": [ "E25", "E19", "E27", "E10", "E28", "E29", "E30", "E34" ] }, { "id": "court-record", "title": "The criminal proceedings", "summary": "The first mistrial, retrial decision, and final verdict.", "note": "The procedural outcomes are recorded separately from the parties' allegations and the experts' interpretations.", "records": [ "E20", "E37", "E21" ] } ] }